Skip to main content

Is the fantastic ABC sitcom temporarily turning into "The Young and the Black-ish"?

I don't know of any long-running sitcom that hasn't gone into a bit of a slump, as it continually attempts to generate interest for their viewers. Some change cast members. Others give the romance angle a try. With the ABC hit show, Black-ish, however, over the past couple weeks, it's taken a drastic turn from topical comedy to soap opera. This past week's episode, "Blue Valentime," in particular felt out of place. While Black-ish has done an extraordinary job to this point in balancing comedy with the tackling of hot topics in the world of current events, that wasn't the case with the most recent episode, where I didn't laugh once. There was honestly nothing to laugh about, not even in an uncomfortable manner. All it showed us were the struggles of the two leads, ending with the two temporarily (at this point) separating. Sure, if the show goes back to expertly balancing comedy and drama, this single moment may appear to just be a blip on the radar at the end of the day. I have a difficult time believing that's the case, however. Why devote an entire episode and a decent chunk of another completely shifting the show's tone and narrative, only to instantly go back to what it was originally? Black-ish is an incredibly good and important show, especially in today's divisive America. I sincerely hope the writers know what they're doing here, because the past couple of episodes have been risky, and if they continue down this soap opera path for much longer, I can all but guarantee they'll start losing some viewers, including this one.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"