Skip to main content

A Straight Pride Parade Is A Straight-Up Bad Idea

An idea for a Straight Pride Parade has been floated about in recent weeks and I'm here to tell everyone, regardless of the organizers' intentions, it's a straight-up bad idea.

There's often debate among Straight White Christian Men's rights advocates that there's a seemingly constant societal double-standard against them. Why can there be a Black History Month but not a White History Month? Why should women's employer-based healthcare plans include contraception coverage, but not men's? Why is it okay to poke fun of Christianity but not Islam? Why can gays get their own parade but not straights?

The fact of the matter is straights have a Constitutional right to hold their own pride parade. Such an event is protected by the First Amendment. That's not what this is about, though. The LGBT community doesn't hold a pride parade every year to tell the world, "Look at us! We can say we're gay because of the Constitution! Hip-hip-hooray!" It's about far more than that.

For any person who thinks there should be a Straight Pride Parade, let me ask you this... When have you ever been prevented from marrying the love of your life because of your sexuality? When have you ever been told you can't adopt children because of your orientation? When have you ever been arrested, fired, or asked to leave an establishment because you're straight? When have you ever been condemned, beaten, or contemplated suicide due to societal norms and pressures because you're heterosexual? When have you ever had to tell your parents, shaking from fear in the process, that you're attracted to the opposite sex and been disowned by them? I'm guessing never.

Whether we want to admit it or not, heterosexuals, such as myself, intentionally or unintentionally parade our privileges to those beneath us according to the law. We take these things for granted. It's literally impossible to fully comprehend what the LGBT community has had to endure throughout their years of oppression. That's what we need to do - listen and try to understand. We may never get there in the literal sense, but the very least we can do is try, and the last thing we need to do is hold a pride parade which touts the rights we've always possessed, taken for granted, and have been withheld from the LGBT community - basically spitting in their faces as a result. We can't cry over our privileges not being displayed in a parade all the while our LGBT brothers and sisters are still being oppressed from that which we've taken for granted. What we should take pride in is helping all oppressed communities attain equality. Then and only then can we legitimately call America the land of the free.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"