Skip to main content

You Can't Spell "Christmas Miracle" Without "Lie"

Tis the season to give, carol, drink eggnog, donate, be merry, all that crap. Oh, I forgot one, it's also the season to lie.

As children, we're often told a story of a jolly, bearded, obese man named Santa Claus and, if we're good, he'll provide us with presents under a tree within our homesteads in the wee morning hours on Christmas Day, but if we're bad, may just place coal in our stockings. Then a few years down the road, if we haven't figured it out already, we're informed that the story isn't actually true.

Okay, so my son is now 3, and I've decided I will not be sharing the big lie with him, for several reasons.

1) Trust. I don't want to lie to him. I want him to trust me. Some say, "Oh, it's just Santa. It's a harmless little lie." No it isn't. Studies have fairly consistently shown that kids who are taught the big lie by their parents are more inclined to be liars themselves when they grow to be adults. They're also less likely to trust others, especially authority figures, or believe in any religion. This isn't even factoring in the time I was traumatized by my little brother's gut-wrenching tears when he learned the truth about Santa. Trust me, my kid's imagination is strong enough, without the addition of a bigly world-traveling phantom. 

2) Unconditional love. I don't like the idea of giving my son an ultimatum based on subjective terminology for expressions of love. Who decides what's naughty and good? Is there a certain dividing line on the number of days one must be naughty or good in order for the recipient to make the cut? Again, I want my son to know I'll love him no matter what. 

3) Hypocrisy. I find it quite hypocritical when a parent tells a child they have to be good in order to receive presents from Santa, for the parent is lying in the process. I don't know about you, but I've always thought that lying was a bad (naughty) thing. Based on this rationale, parents should be the ones receiving coal in their stockings.

4) Appreciation. People work hard to save money to spend for their loved ones on Christmas. I want my son growing up to know who exactly it is that took time out of their day and money out of their account to provide him with the gift he's holding. It wasn't a stranger he'll never meet; it was nana, mommy, daddy, papa. 

5) Future. Based on the aforementioned studies, while I myself may not be religious, I don't want to potentially impede on my son's personal religious exploration. If he winds up being nonreligious as well, so be it. If he goes a different route, that's fine too. I just want that to be his decision, not mine.

6) Hope. I don't want my son to grow up thinking the only do-gooders in the world come via fairy tales. I want him to see and experience the generosity of many during this time of the year: providing food for the homeless, toys for underprivileged kids, etc. I want to instill in him hope that there are good people in this world, and that he himself can make a difference. 

7) Dreams. I want him to be able to think up the seemingly unthinkable and not have his near impossible dreams quashed because he came to believe that miracles were all inevitably lies.

8) Spirit. I want him to understand the true joy of the holiday season doesn't reside in the fiction of Santa Claus; it resides in the reality of being and sharing special moments with family, friends, and loved ones.

Parents can do as they so choose. I just sometimes wonder if these holiday traditions based on falsehoods are more for the adults than the children, for children already possess great imaginations and adults may just be attempting to recapture a glimpse of their childhood. Good or bad, though, I'll love my son unconditionally, and I don't need Santa Claus to be a kid with him.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"