Skip to main content

Standing Up For "Liberation"

I see a lot of people bashing "Liberation" for being a Queen-rip-off; possessing "awful" lyrics; and/or listing it as the worst, or at least one of the worst songs off Will of the People. While everyone has the right to an opinion, all the negativity surrounding the song prompted me to post a positive write-up of it.

First off, while there are undoubtedly Queen-influences present in this track, I see them as much less overbearing than in some other songs - most notably "United States of Eurasia" (love this track too, by the way). The most obvious said inspiration occurs between the verse and chorus, where multiple vocals are layered - somewhat reminiscent of "Bohemian Rhapsody." That's it, though, and such a musical maneuver is far from rare in Muse's catalog. Hell, just look at this album - the same type of sound transpires at the very tail-end of "We Are F-ing F-ed" (another great song). Queen has long been a major influence on Muse, but, and Queen legendary guitarist Brian May has made similar claims, the band hasn't blatantly ripped-off Queen, so much as they've simply incorporated elements from the band's music to help form their own distinctive sound.

When it comes to lyrics, I've heard everything from "Matt Bellamy is a genius!" to "His lyrics are so cringe!" The most common reaction tends to be something along the lines of "Eh, whatever. I've never listened to Muse for the lyrics." Regardless of your opinion, I feel two things which make poetry most effective are empathy and relatability. The former helps the writer to better understand the subject about which he or she is writing, and also exhibits a greater heart and sensitivity to the author. The latter increases potential outreach, as people of all stripes can directly feel some semblance of inspiration from it - almost as if the song is being sung specifically for them. Matt has said "Liberation" was inspired by the Black Lives Matter movement and protests. Living in the U.S.; knowing Black Americans who have been unfairly targeted by law enforcement due to the color of their skin; and taken part in this very movement myself, whenever I hear this song, I get chills. I immediately see images of unarmed Black men and women being killed by cops: George Floyd, Tamir Rice, Eric Garner, Walter Scott, the list sadly goes on and on. But then I envision protests far and wide; people of all stripes coming together to right the wrongs of the past which have continued into the present; and at the end of the day Martin Luther King's dream ultimately coming to fruition.

The song was inspired by real-life events, which makes it all the more impactful to me. It showcases empathy, which is sadly lacking in this world - so, to me at least, it comes across as refreshing. All in all, I think it's one of the two most powerful tracks on the new album, along with "Verona." It reflects on what was and provides hope for what will be.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"