Skip to main content

Bad June for Democrats Overstated

I just read an article about how June has already been an awful month for the Democratic Party and well, it basically laid claim that Armageddon was soon around the corner for the Democrats. Why? Three things: 1) The May jobs' report, 2) The Wisconsin results and 3) May fundraising.

Has it been a good start for the Democrats this month? No. But are people overreacting? Yes. The May jobs' report was a big disappointment, without question, but let's put things into perspective. If a similar jobs report had come out at the end of Bush's tenure or the start of Obama's (or even middle of it), it would have received glowing reviews. Due to it (and the previous month's report), it appears as if job growth has definitely slowed, however, it was still a net positive, which makes it, what, 12 straight months with such results? I'm too lazy to fact-check right at this moment, but I think I'm close to accurate with that number. Again, it was very disappointing, however, I don't think it's the end of the world. We're still coming out of a recession and we'll have to wait and see what happens with the June, July and August job reports. Does this trend continue and we appear to be at a complete halt with the job growth in this country or does the growth begin to increase again? Was this an aberration or the start of a trend? That's yet to be determined and it'd be silly for most laypeople columnists to speculate on the matter.

With regard to Wisconsin, this story has been blown even further out of proportion than the jobs' report. Scott Walker won the recall. However, Democrats won back control of the state senate and, depending on the poll you believe, among Wisconsin voters on Tuesday, Obama held either a 7- or 11-point advantage over Romney, which is consistent with polling there (on average, he's led by about 8 points in the state). Almost every poll indicated Walker would win, about half claimed he'd win comfortable on Tuesday. It was not a shock that he did so. When asked, it seems as if a majority of the people in the state didn't agree with the recall vote - they didn't feel it was the right thing to do and voted in such a manner. Again, it's not like the Republican base was a great deal more fired up than the Democratic one. Obama had a lead between 7 and 11 points over Romney among the voters and the Democrats won back control of the state senate. Unfortunately, it seems that only Walker's victory is making headlines.

Finally, it was reported yesterday that the Romney Campaign netted more cash in fundraising for the month of May than Team Obama. This was the first time Obama had been out-raised in 2007 by Hillary Clinton during the Democratic Primary. Again, no, it's not great news for the Democratic Party, but once again, it was the first time it has happened in five years. Let's get a grip here. Like I said with the jobs' report, will this be the start of a trend or was it simply an aberration? That can't be determined at this point.

So, Democrats, take a deep breath. While it has not been a great start for the party this month, it's not the end of the world. There are still 5 months until the election and as of this point, Obama is up between 2 and 3 points nationally and ahead in some very key swing states/near swing states (Minnesota, Wisconsin, Iowa, Colorado, Michigan, Ohio, Virginia, Nevada, Pennsylvania, etc.) and is being given a 60% chance of winning in November. Even with the disappointing jobs' report, the Wisconsin results and the fundraising totals, Obama is currently ahead. So once again, take a deep breath... There, that's better...

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"