Skip to main content

The fireworks have officially gone dead on Independence Day

Time with friends and family, barbecues, music, and blowing sh*t up. What wasn't there to like about the 4th of July growing up? I especially liked lighting the fireworks in the street and then walking back, feeling all cool, like I had just done something profound. As I entered middle school, high school, and college, I became increasingly more likely to watch free fireworks shows, let other people do the lighting, and actually take into account what the holiday represented. I mean, honestly, when we were kids, how often did we actually associate the 4th of July with this country's independence? That brings me to this year's celebration, if you want to call it that.

While "President" Trump was able to hold a waste-of-bigly-money parade and prove he didn't know history during his speech, I, like a lot of Americans, I think, felt an unseeming sadness when all the fireworks were going off. The holiday is supposed to celebrate our independence, our freedom, what this nation was founded on (eh, post-Natives), and what it stands for. Yet, this year, as people were grilling in their yards; kids were lighting off fireworks; and millions wore the flag as if they were Eddie Murphy's character from the film Coming to America right after he travels to New York from Africa, I reflected. It's looking increasingly more likely that a foreign adversary may have indeed flipped a presidential election of ours. The "president" has continually derided the mainstream media as "fake news," discrediting them at every possible turn. African-Americans, such as Colin Kaepernick, have essentially been blackballed for silently protesting issues like police brutality. Instead of building bridges, the "president" wants to build walls. In a nation founded on immigration, Trump has painted immigrants as the enemy. The "president" has banned transgenders from serving in our military. Women's reproductive rights are seemingly decreasing by the day. Donald Trump himself is likely to have committed financial crimes, not to mention crimes against women. Over 20 women have come forward to allege him of sexual improprieties. So whose freedom were we celebrating this year? It couldn't have been women's, blacks', Hispanics', Muslims', LGBTs, etc. No, it was just of old rich white men, who are vocally Christian, seemingly above the law, and believe in oligarchy.

I don't want to be a buzzkill, but after you engorged in some ribs, had a few drinks, and enjoyed the fireworks, I hope you were able to spend some time reflecting like I did. Just saying we're the freest nation on earth doesn't make it so, and with Trump in office, at least for a large majority of us, our rights have been on a steady decline. Rights aren't to be taken for granted. As soon as we do so, they'll burn out just like some of those fireworks you wasted money on. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"