Skip to main content

Just stop it with the "irregardless" debate!

When debating the electoral college vote, Missouri Senator and man voted most likely to sell his children for a tiny handful of votes - Josh Hawley - uttered the "word" "irregardless." After poking fun at him for it on Twitter, I received one passionate dissenting voice. She even went so far as to claim I had the vocabulary of a grade-school kid, because I didn't consider "irregardless" to be a legitimate term.

Yes, most dictionaries state that "irregardless" is a "nonstandard" word and tend to add something along the lines of, "It's not the recommended form of the term, especially in written papers. Also, whenever it is written or spoken by a person, he or she will immediately be viewed as an idiot."

So, yes, a person has every right to use this word/non-word. At the same time, however, I have every right to tease said individual for expressing this word/non-word.

Let's think about this for a second here...

Regardless means "without regard."

"Irregardless" means "not without regard."

"Irregardless" therefore means "with regard."

Why not then just say "with regard?" Because, when people say "irregardless," what they think they're saying is "regardless," even though the two terms are antonymous. It'd be like a person saying they had herpes, when they actually meant to express they were herpes-free. 

The conversation would go a little something like this:

Mike Scratch: "Guess what, honey?"

Melissa Sniff: "You got us tickets to that new movie, 'Texas Chainsaw Massacre: Christian Rendition'?"

Mike: "No, I have herpes!"

Melissa: "You what?"

Mike: "I went to the doctor; got tested; and I have the herpes!"

Melissa: "Eh, okay, I think I better go."

Mike: "But it's our date night! I'm making White Castle!"

Melissa: "I'm making a trip to the doctor's."

Mike: "Why would you need to do that? I mean, I have herpes. What's there to worry about?"

Melissa: "That! See ya around, Mr. Lotsa-Scratch."

Mike: "Well, that was weird. Did I say something wrong? I thought she'd be happy I was clean. You think you know people..."

So, whenever you're about to say "irregardless" in place of "regardless," just remember you're basically admitting you have herpes when in fact you don't. You're welcome.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun
2 comments
Read more

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i
Post a Comment
Read more

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"
Post a Comment
Read more