Skip to main content

Watching "Crash" 18 years after release... (Spoilers?)

I remember seeing the 2006 Oscar-winning film Crash in the theaters in 2004. I was 23 years old, in college, in the midst of taking a "Film History and Appreciation" course, and upon seeing it, immediately thought:

- It was powerful.

- The acting was superb.

- The interconnected stories increased my interest.

- It was a solid film (4 or 4.5 out of 5 stars)

- But something was missing...

When I discussed the film with my future sister-in-law, while I made the aforementioned comments, I also noted that the dialogue felt forced at times.

For whatever reason, I decided to view the film again in the past week - 18 years later, and here are my observations:

- There were powerful moments.

- The acting was great, but character-development was sorely lacking.

- The interconnected stories were interesting, but took away from the before-mentioned character-development.

- The dialogue was often cringe-worthy. 

- Overall, good movie, but not great, and definitely not Oscar-worthy (3 or 3.5 out of 5 stars).

The 23-year-old me was right on the money with one thing - the forced dialogue. When I first viewed the film 18 years ago, perhaps due to inexperience and naivety, it was just a strange gut feeling which told me something was off about the dialogue, but 18 years later, that subtle gut-feeling became a pounding over the head with a sledgehammer by Peter Gabriel on steroids. Just about every discussion went from zero to race-card faster than you can say Genesis. It didn't matter if the conversation began with talk of the weather, golf, or Casper the friendly ghost, I can all but guarantee it would soon transition to allegations of racism. Here are exaggerated examples of what took place:

Character A: "So, how about that weather, huh? F*cking beautiful! There's no greater feeling than that sun shining down on you, you know?"

Character B: "Oh? And what is that supposed to mean? Are you saying I can't get sunburned because I'm black? Listen here, buddy, I may be black, but I can still get burned!"

A: "That's not what I was saying at all. I was just saying it was a beautiful day today."

B: "Oh? ...and is that code for, 'The day is beautiful but you're not? Compared to the day, you look like sh*t?' ...and what is with all this 'shining down on you' bullsh*t? Are you seriously trying to say the sun is being condescending to me? Huh?!?"

 

Character A: "How do you pronounce your name?"

Character B: "Whore-hey, and no, I'm not from Mexico."

A: "Okay..."

B: "I know that's what you were thinking. Jorge? Mexican."

A: "But we met on HispanicsNotMexicans.com."

B: "So?"

A: "...and you suggested a Nicaraguan restaurant."

B: "So what?"

A: "...and you have a tattoo of Guatemala on your forehead."

B: "Exactly! And you still have the gall to assume I'm Mexican?!? Racist!"


Character A: "You bowl, right?"

Character B: "Oh, you think, because I'm white, I bowl, do you?"

A: "Well, you are holding a bowling ball."

B: "And?"

A: "We're at a bowling alley."

B: "And?"

A: "It's your turn. Me and the rest of the team have been waiting for 5 minutes."


Racism is an incredibly important subject, sadly still highly prevalent in modern-day society, and deserves to be treated in a serious, yet respectful manner on the screen, in order to provide greater emotional impact for viewers. Crash largely failed in that regard. I recommend checking out The Hate U Give instead, and providing the 2006 Best Picture award to either Munich or Brokeback Mountain.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"