Skip to main content

My second Obamacare experience just as scary as my first!

Death panels. Hitler. The end of democracy. The sky is falling. Armageddon. Republican politicians and talking heads have pretty much made every over-the-top claim one could possibly think of with regard to the Affordable Care Act (AKA Obamacare). Texas Senator Ted Cruz even shut down the federal government in an attempt to repeal the healthcare reform law. Outside of some troubles signing up for coverage initially on the glitchy healthcare website, however, I can't complain about my experiences with the new law.

I haven't needed my new insurance card much since enrolling a year and a half ago, but just having it makes me feel more secure than I had been the previous couple of years after I was let go by my insurance provider and rejected by other health insurance companies due to pre-existing conditions. I've needed my card in recent weeks, however, and it's saved me a good chunk of money to this point. The monthly premium and co-pays have been reasonably priced and I've yet to have to pay a cent on three prescriptions ordered for me by doctors. My father told me he'd never, in all his years, gotten a prescription for free. But with my new healthcare plan, I'm a perfect 3 for 3 on that front. The wait times haven't been extraordinarily long. The call-backs with test results have been rather quick. So while I don't think the Affordable Care Act is the final step in our country reforming healthcare, I think it is definitely a step in the right direction, and I'm very happy we passed it into law. For without it, I'd likely still be without health insurance and debating whether to potentially bankrupt myself by seeing a doctor about the excruciating pain I've been experiencing in my feet or sitting at home, in agony, hoping the pain will magically go away. So, while many have used this phrase in a sarcastic tone, I'd like to sincerely say thanks, Obama.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"