Skip to main content

Bill Maher is woke about John Hughes

I have a love-hate relationship with HBO personality and fellow progressive Bill Maher. While I tend to agree with his viewpoints approximately 80% of the time, my opinions run in stark contrast to his the other 20%. Even when I do agree with him on a subject, there's a good chance he'll go so overboard with a rant, it'll make me cringe as a result. Having said all that, I definitely agree with what he said regarding Hollywood's evolution of wokeness in Friday's episode of Real Time.

Apparently, Molly Ringwald of the John Hughes teen classic, Breakfast Club, has recently said, in hindsight, she finds that film and others like it to be troubling in the age of the #MeToo movement. Maher responded by saying, "Stop being surprised every time you watch an old movie or TV show and find some of the ideas in it are - old."

He added, "It's nuts to blame someone for not being 'woke' 30 years before 'woke' became a thing. I remember the 80's. Being 'woke' means you had too much cocaine. ... More recently, 20 years ago, the jokes on Friends were 'just funny.' These days, however, 'some millennials - some! I applaud the sane ones - find the jokes sexist, transphobic and fat-shaming.'"

Maher then said this:

"You can't enjoy music, movies or TV from 'back when' for any length of time without seeing something we just don't do any more. But aren't we adult enough to separate what we like about an old movie from what we don't?' We can watch Big as a movie about a kid who becomes an adult, not as a movie 'about a grown woman who f*cks a 12 year old. ... The most beloved and wholesome act in history was The Beatles but even they wrote 'She was just 17, you know what I mean,' which today sounds a little Roy Moore-ish."

He closed with these historical tidbits:

"- In the early 1900's, heroin was a children's cough medicine.

- In the 50's, amphetamines were sold to housewives as diet pills.

- We used to drive without seat belts.

- And drink while we were pregnant.

- And litter indiscriminately - just throw sh*t out the window!

- We smoked on airplanes. We would board an enclosed aluminum tube, with old people and children and asthmatics, and light up a Chesterfield.

- We had pageants where we paraded women in swimsuits and judged them on their appearance. Oh wait - we still do that."

While I may strongly disagree with Maher on a number of points, he's right here. Look, we all make mistakes, both individually and collectively. What's of grave importance isn't the initial mistake, but learning from it and evolving. This can only happen if one admits the mistake(s). How can one learn from a mistake if he or she denies it ever existed? That same logic rings true here. I'll be the first to admit there are some points in our history which embarrass the hell out of me and I wish had never taken place. However, I and others can't just pretend like these events never took place. If we do that, we'll make ourselves more susceptible to repeating these atrocious mistakes. It's perfectly understandable for the Molly Ringwalds of the world to look back at a piece of art from decades back and cringe due to their seemingly low level of "wokeness." However, instead of fixating on and feeling remorse for that previous "mistake" (if one wants to refer to it as such), it'd be highly more beneficial to appreciate the art for what it is, see it as a building block, and look at how much we've evolved since then. Evolution isn't possible if we don't see need for it.

http://deadline.com/2018/04/bill-maher-blasts-critics-of-un-woke-old-tv-shows-and-movies-real-time-1202363189/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"