Skip to main content

When sarcasm led to an arrest...

As I've long said, regardless of how much we don't want to believe it, freedom is not absolute. Whether it be our freedom to say what's on our mind or to own a firearm, there are certain guidelines to each and every "freedom." Having said that, I think law enforcement went too far in arresting Green Bay Packers wide receiver Trevor Davis after he made a bomb joke at Los Angeles International Airport the other day.

At the ticket counter, Davis, who was with his girlfriend, was asked if he "was carrying any aerosol cans, knives, weapons or explosives." He then turned to his girlfriend and sarcastically asked if she remembered to pack the explosives.

Look, should Davis have been detained and questioned? Yes. But should the guy have been arrested? Give me a break... First off, I've flown hundreds of times and have never been asked if I was carrying any aerosol cans, knives, weapons or explosives. If I were to be asked such a ridiculous question, chances are I'd provide a puzzled look, chuckle, and say, "Uh, no." Secondly, if a person were carrying such substances, why in the world would they answer yes? Do they really think if they were to ask a terrorist, who has every intention of bombing an airplane or airport, whether or not they were carrying explosives, they'd admit to it? Uh, no...

Trevor Davis shouldn't have said what he said. However, the guy was obviously kidding around, and while he should have been questioned, he shouldn't be arrested for the quip. Lost in all this is the fact the most troubling aspect of the situation seems to be getting lost on many. While Davis's joke may have been inappropriate and is garnering the brunt of the attention, what's more disturbing to me is the fact our security experts actually seem to believe, if asked at the ticket counter of an airport, terrorists will readily admit they're carrying explosives.

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2769170-packers-wr-trevor-davis-arrested-for-making-bomb-joke-at-lax-airport

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun...

Mentioned on Crooks and Liars and Hinterland Gazette!

Due to some tweets of mine, I got mentioned on the following two sites (all my tweets can be viewed here -  https://twitter.com/CraigRozniecki ): https://crooksandliars.com/2019/04/trump-gives-stupid-advice-george https://hinterlandgazette.com/2019/03/istandwithschiff-is-trending-after-donald-trump-led-gop-attack-on-adam-schiff-backfires-spectacularly.html

Face guarding is legal in college football and the NFL

I just wanted to remind fans and announcers especially, that face guarding is legal in both college football and the NFL. It all comes down to contact. So long as a defender doesn't make contact with an intended receiver, he doesn't have to turn around to play the ball. I can't tell you how many times every week I hear announcers talk about face guarding being a penalty. It's not. I even heard one announcer yesterday state, "If the defender doesn't turn around and play the ball, the ref will call pass interference every time." That's simply not true. Courtesy of referee Bill LeMonnier, he says this with regard to the rule at the college level (answered on 8/12/13): "NCAA rules on pass interference require the face guarding to have contact to be a foul. No contact, no foul by NCAA rules." In the NFL rule book, this is written:  "Actions that constitute defensive pass interference include but are not limited to: (a) Contact by a ...