Skip to main content

Contrary to what Comey said, Donald Trump does not have "above-average" intelligence

One of the most surprising quotes from James Comey's interview on ABC last night was when he contended that Donald Trump has "above-average intelligence." After making some quips about the remark on Twitter, a fellow progressive defended Comey, saying, "Trump would have to be smart to dupe so many people!"

Okay, let's just get this out of the way - Donald Trump is not smart. A rich man does not make a smart man. The Donald was born into money, was always surrounded by people who knew money, and as a result, guess what? The guy has money. Also, it doesn't take a genius to use bullsh*t to persuade another to also believe bullsh*t. It has been scientifically proven that the earth is round. Even so, there are people who deny this fact and believe it to be flat. So if one flat-earther convinces another to be a flat-earther, can other be constituted as smart? I don't think so. It's just one idiot persuading another to hop on the idiot train.

Let's review the president's unprecedented intellect:

- He doesn't like to read. Some have even questioned if he's fully literate.

- I have not once heard him admit to being wrong.

- The guy has the intellectual curiosity of a dead sloth.

- He has a 4th-grade vocabulary.

- The man lies approximately 70% of the time and only tells the truth about 15% of the time (15% are graded as half-true/half-false).

- He consistently uses words such as: Covfefe, unpresidented, bigly, tapp phones, W.H. council, to great, attacker, Denmakr, hearby/here by, our deepest apologizes, Secretary of Educatuon, Honered to serve, etc.

Need I continue? Donald Trump is uneducated, unwilling to learn, rarely tells or even knows the truth, and may not even pass a 4th-grade vocabulary test. These are not signs of a man who has above-average intelligence, let alone signs of a man who is "smart." Donald Trump may be a lot of things, but being intelligent isn't one of them.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun
2 comments
Read more

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i
Post a Comment
Read more

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"
Post a Comment
Read more