Skip to main content

Even minus COVID, more jobs were added under Obama and Biden than Trump, bigly

I've previously broken down, via the Bureau of Labor statistics, how much better the economies were and are under Presidents Obama and Biden than it was under Donald Trump.

At this, the only response I've received from Trumpers is:

"COVID! Trump had the best economy in history until COVID and all the jobs under Biden are just the ones which were lost during it! COVID! COVID! COVID!"

Never mind the fact Trump ignored the worst pandemic since the Spanish flu for roughly a month and millions more lives would be significantly/permanently impacted as a result, but I digress. I'll play their game.

Donald Trump was in office for 3 years before COVID struck the U.S.

Here were the jobs numbers by year:
2/17-1/18: 2.031M
2/18-1/19: 2.395M
2/19-1/20: 1.983M
Total: 6.409M

Let's contrast that with Obama's final 3 years in the Oval Office:

2/14-1/15: 3.011M
2/15-1/16: 2.634M
2/16-1/17: 2.440M
Total: 8.085M

In other words, nearly 1.7M more jobs were created in Obama's final 3 years than in Trump's first 3. Obama's worst year (2.440M) was still better than Trump's best year (2.395M).

So, to say the economy under Trump was the best in U.S. history, even before COVID, is comical.

Moving onto President Biden. The jobs lost during COVID were fully recovered as of the May, 2022 jobs report. In the 23 months since then, 6.358M jobs have been added to the economy. Let me repeat that. In Trump's first 36 months as "president," 6.409M jobs were added. In Biden's last 23 months as President, 6.358M have been added.

So, here's the monthly jobs breakdown:

Obama's final 3 years: 224,583 per month
Trump's first 3 years: 178,028 per month
Biden's last 23 months: 276,435 per month

Even if we were to remove COVID from the equation (which we shouldn't do, considering how badly Trump handled the situation), the economies under Presidents Obama and Biden have been much stronger than the economy ever was under Trump.
https://data.bls.gov/timeseries/ces0000000001?output_view=net_1mth

https://statista.com/chart/24363/number-of-jobs-lost-since-february-2020/
#RepublicansLieAboutEverything #VoteBlue

Labels

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun...
2 comments
Read more

Face guarding is legal in college football and the NFL

I just wanted to remind fans and announcers especially, that face guarding is legal in both college football and the NFL. It all comes down to contact. So long as a defender doesn't make contact with an intended receiver, he doesn't have to turn around to play the ball. I can't tell you how many times every week I hear announcers talk about face guarding being a penalty. It's not. I even heard one announcer yesterday state, "If the defender doesn't turn around and play the ball, the ref will call pass interference every time." That's simply not true. Courtesy of referee Bill LeMonnier, he says this with regard to the rule at the college level (answered on 8/12/13): "NCAA rules on pass interference require the face guarding to have contact to be a foul. No contact, no foul by NCAA rules." In the NFL rule book, this is written:  "Actions that constitute defensive pass interference include but are not limited to: (a) Contact by a ...
2 comments
Read more