Skip to main content

Giants 29 Eagles 16

For the second consecutive week, the Philadelphia Eagles led their opponent going into the 4th quarter, up 31-21 a week ago in Atlanta and 16-14 yesterday against the New York Giants. In those two games, they've been outscored 29-0 in the 4th quarter. Sure, Michael Vick wasn't able to play much in either final quarter, but what about the defense, especially that secondary that the Eagles' spent so much money on in the off-season revamping? I don't care if Vick is playing or not. Up ten at the end of three, having scored 31 points, should be good enough to win the game. Yesterday's loss is excusable, as Philly just led by 2 points at the end of three and a field goal by the G-Men would have proved enough for the victory. At worst, though, Philly should be 2-1.

The good? Philly moved the ball on the Giants pretty well throughout the course of the game. Tailback LeSean McCoy had another solid game, which included a few big runs. Michael Vick spread the ball around fairly efficiently and utilized his legs on a few occasions, but only as a last resort. The special teams was sound and the run defense played better than they had been, especially in their week one game against St. Louis. Also, Philly showed an ability to come back for the third straight week, having trailed 14-0, only to take the lead at the end of three by the score of 16-14.

The bad? The Eagles failed to score touchdowns, kicking three field goals. This was especially bad when Philly had the ball inside the Giants 1-yard line on a 2nd-and-goal and failed to score six. The Eagles were also stopped short on a critical 4th-and-1 in the early part of the 4th quarter. The secondary may be full of talent and improved from last season (not saying much), but they have not appeared to be very good in the early part of the season. To go with the very average front seven, this will prove to be disastrous for the Eagles if the secondary doesn't improve this year. Finally, the pass protection has been dreadful. I wonder if Michael Vick even wants to play next week, having suffered a concussion and a broken hand these past couple weeks, and a bruised butt, I have to imagine.

Now the big question is, will Michael Vick play next week? He did break his non-throwing hand, which is good news, but it's yet to be known if he'll start against the 49ers. Whether he plays or not, the Eagles have a lot to work on, from their pass protection to their red zone offense to their pass defense to their closing out games. My advice? Run LeSean McCoy early and often to hopefully take pressure off quarterback Michael Vick. In short-yardage situations, perhaps go to back-up bruiser Ronnie Brown. Also, short slants, outs, screens will help take pressure off Vick. When the defense takes pressure off, then fire one deep for Jackson or Maclin. Vick, like Jay Cutler of the Bears, is getting hit way too much and in not being the biggest quarterback in the league, cannot take so many hits for a game, let alone a season. Sports "analysts" talked about anything less than a Super Bowl would be a disappointment for Eagles' fans. The way they've played these first three weeks, I'd just hope for a Wild Card spot in the playoffs unless they can start putting things together and improve in the coming weeks. The only good news for them right now when it comes to the playoffs is that the NFC appears to be the second weakest conference in the NFC, only ahead of the West, with the North (Packers, Bears and Lions) and South (Saints, Buccaneers and Falcons) leading the way.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"