Skip to main content

Not yet sold on Cam Newton

There's no question that Carolina Panthers' rookie quarterback, whom they took #1 overall in this past year's draft, is very talented and physically speaking, is ideal. The guy is 6'6'' and anything but skin and bones, to go along with a strong throwing arm and an ability to make something out of nothing with his running abilities. The rookie has played well in his first three games in the NFL, throwing for close to 900 yards in his first two games and winning his first NFL game yesterday against Jacksonville. However, unlike most sports "analysts," I'm not buying the notion that Newton is the next great quarterback in the league.

Newton may have thrown for close to 900 yards in his first two games, but was also picked off 4 times and his team lost both games. If we're looking at it from a Fantasy Football perspective, Newton was quite a steal the first two weeks of the season, but was also careless with the ball at times and from a team standpoint, led the Panthers to an 0-2 start. I'm not bashing the guy and saying he's going to be a joke. It's too early to say that, but just the opposite is true. It's too early to lay claim that he's going to be the next great quarterback in the league. He's 3 games into his NFL career. That's an extremely small sample size. Hall-of-Fame quarterback Troy Aikman had some growing pains his rookie season for the Dallas Cowboys. If we were to judge the guy based on his first three games, he wouldn't have lasted two years in the league. Word has it he did okay. Another Hall-of-Fame quarterback, Steve Young, was back-up for several years behind Joe Montana of the San Francisco 49ers. Once again, Young turned out to be one of the better quarterbacks in the game. On the flip side, Rex Grossman got off to a great start quarterbacking the Chicago Bears, but has played the role of back-up since then, until this year with the Washington Redskins. Former Steelers' quarterback Kordell Stewart generated a lot of excitement his rookie season, but as teams began to figure out how to defense him, he ended up becoming more of a utility player than a quarterback. So, let's not make such predictions with Cam Newton yet. Give the guy time to learn the offense, improve and the defenses time to adjust and Newton time to re-adjust before we come to such conclusions.

The fact of the matter is Cam Newton played in a very simplistic offense at Auburn. That gimmick won't be consistently successful in the NFL. Coming out of college, Newton reminded me of a quicker, more elusive JaMarcus Russell (of LSU, drafted #1 by the Oakland Raiders). Like Russell, Newton is very raw. The guy started one year in college before going pro. Both quarterbacks played in un-NFL-like offenses in college. Both have strong throwing arms, but weren't the most accurate of passers coming out of college. They also possessed some power and speed with running the football, Newton definitely being the more dangerous of the two. One could also make the argument that Newton is somewhat similar to Vince Young, but Young is arguably quicker with less powerful of a throwing arm. Also, Young quarterbacked the Texas Longhorns for more than a single season, so he was much further along in the development process than Newton and to his credit, Young improved as a passer in each of his years at Texas and this carried on into the NFL until he had some personal problems. We're too early in Newton's career to know just how well he will develop. Has he reached his ceiling? When defenses have enough film of him and they make adjustments, will Newton be able to successful adjust to the defensive adjustments? Cam Newton is an extremely talented athlete, but I'm not ready to crown the guy as the next great quarterback. Talk to me next year and while I still won't be able to give a definitive answer, I'll likely have a better hunch on what to expect of the youngster.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"