Skip to main content

Remembering George H.W. Bush

I was between 8 and 12 years old when George H.W. Bush was president. At that time, I followed politics about as closely as a meteorologist follows flurries in Buffalo. Pretty much all I remember about him during that time are: 1) His rather distinct voice; 2) "Read my lips - no new taxes;" 3) Desert Storm; and 4) That he was a Republican; and 5) Dana Carvey doing a spot-on impression of him on Saturday Night Live. So, safe to say, 99% of what I've learned about the man have come in the years after his presidency.

It's pretty amazing, in this day and age, to stand back and look at how the Republican Party has changed over the past several decades. Look at where they are today. Whether they like to admit it or not, Donald Trump has become the face of the party. His ideology now coincides with that of the GOP. While the party was shifting rightward during the late Bush's years as president, it was still in that transition stage between moderate, civil, respectable party and far-right, angry, embarrassing party. This is largely why, at least from a liberal's vantage point, the George H.W. Bush presidency is a such a perplexing one.

While the 41st president went to war in the Middle East, he also set forth a quicker, more cost-efficient plan than did his son. While he talked a big game about not raising taxes, he actually did. H.W. signed bills which helped to protect the environment and provide aid for the disabled. At the same time, he nominated Clarence Thomas to the Supreme Court, which may have largely paved the way for an individual like Brett Kavanaugh to be nominated. Bush penned a letter to the NRA, cancelling his membership. He was eloquent when passing over the reigns to his successor, Democrat Bill Clinton. Like I said, remembering George H.W. Bush's legacy is a complicated one, especially for a self-described progressive.

Sadly, when reflecting on the Republican Party, I'm probably beginning to sound like my parents with regard to music or technology: "I remember, back in the day..." The fact of the matter is, I rarely agreed with Bush when it came to his policies, yet even then, for some strange reason, I wish he and people like him were more representative of the Republican Party of today than the man we currently have in the Oval Office. For all of his flaws, George H.W. Bush was willing to work across the aisle with Democrats; he showed respect to members of the media; he was unafraid to stand up to conservative-dominated lobbyists and special interest groups on occasion; and he could laugh at himself. That may sound unimportant, but I like for the person in the highest office in the land to be confident and secure, yet to be able to display even the slightest semblance of humility. Donald Trump doesn't possess that. One joke at his expense and he lets loose on Twitter like a speed-induced cat on a ball of yarn. That's where we are today with the Republican Party. Donald Trump and his ilk have lowered standards to such a grand extent, any semblance of civility, security, and/or humility would be seen as a step up.

Even though I may have often disagreed with his politics, unlike the current president, George H.W. Bush actually attempted to serve the country and not just himself. He genuinely felt his decisions were the right ones to move our country forward, and especially in this day-and-age, I have to respect that. Thank you for your service, Mr. Bush. Rest in peace.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"