Skip to main content

Thanks for the comedy material, PETA...

PETA (People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals) has decided to take their message to Twitter. In a pair of tweets which have garnered some attention, the organization said this:

- "Words matter, and as our understanding of social justice evolves, our language evolves along with it. Here's how to remove speciesism from your daily conversations."

- "Just as it became unacceptable to use racist, homophobic, or ableist language, phrases that trivialize cruelty to animals will vanish as more people begin to appreciate animals for who they are and start 'bringing home the bagels' instead of the bacon."

In addition to that cliché alteration, PETA recommends these:

Instead of "Kill two birds with one stone.," say "Feed two birds with one scone."

Instead of "Be the guinea pig.," say "Be the test tube."

Instead of "Beat a dead horse.," say "Feed a fed horse."

Instead of "Take the bull by the horns.," say "Take the flower by the thorns."

First, allow me to respond to all five of PETA's suggestions.

1) "Bringing home the bagels" in place of "Bringing home the bacon" - I'm sorry, but this just doesn't work. After returning home from work at 6 or 7 in the evening, what spouse/parent shouts out, "I'm home! Guess what I have? Bruegger's Bagels! Did you hear me?!? Bagels for dinner again!" Come up with a better recommendation, PETA, especially when you're attempting to replace bacon!

2) "Feed two birds with one scone" in place of "Kill two birds with one stone" - Depending on the size of the birds and the scone, isn't it possible a scone could kill two birds? Perhaps we can combine the two phrases to say "Kill two birds with one scone" or "Feed two birds with one stone." It seems that the common denominator in all four of these scenarios is dead birds. RIP.

3) "Be a test tube" in place of "Be a guinea pig" - I don't want to be either, thank you very much!

4) "Feed a fed horse" in place of "Beat a dead horse" - Really? Is feeding an already fed horse the kindest form of action? If a person chows down at an all-you-can-eat buffet, claims they're full up to their lower-lip, and you continue to feed him, the odds are high you'll soon be wearing what they were eating. Hell, it's possible to overeat oneself to death, so feeding a fed horse could wind up turning into feeding a dead horse.

5) "Take the flower by the thorns" instead of "Take the bull by the horns" - Neither scenario sounds very pleasurable. It sounds like a question in the game Would You Rather? "Would you rather literally grab a bull by the horns or literally grab a flower by the thorns?"

In addition to these ridiculously stupid anti-animal-phrase-alteration suggestions made by PETA, allow me to provide a few more. Please keep in mind I will be making up some of these anti-animal phrases. You're welcome.

Instead of: "He's hung like a horse!"

Say: "Penises should never face state-sponsored executions."


Instead of: "They eat like frickin' pigs!"

Say: "At least pigs use sporks."


Instead of: "Drink like a fish."

Say: "Eat like a Catholic during lent."


Instead of: "Lions led by donkeys."

Say: "Asses rule all!"


Instead of: "Raining cats and dogs."

Say: "It's raining Kibbles 'n' Bits."


Instead of: "Crapping like an elephant after eating Mexican."

Say: "I have a big announcement to make: I'm going to invest my fortune in the stocks of Imodium and Pepto Bismol."


Instead of: "Longer than a giraffe's neck after taking Viagra."

Say: "It's been four hours, doc, and I'm starting to see some spots."


Instead of: "You're prettier than a zebra fur coat."

Say: "I secretly want to f*ck zebras."

Wait, no... Okay, nothing else is coming to mind at the moment, so let's go with that.


Instead of: "Getting milked like a cow named Lactosia."

Say: "I am strong proponent of public breastfeeding."


Instead of: "Dumber than sheep."

Say: "At least actual sheep didn't vote for Trump."

https://www.kcrg.com/content/news/PETA-asks-people-to-stop-using-anti-animal-language-including-common-phrases-502067711.html

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"