Skip to main content

Podcast: "I Feel Snitty," Episode 179: "'Machines Said' (parody based on the Bush song, 'Machinehead')" is now available!

The latest episode of my podcast ("I Feel Snitty"), entitled, "'Machines Said' (parody based on the Bush song, 'Machinehead')" is now available!

The song can be heard here - https://ifeelsnitty.podbean.com/e/machines-said-parody-based-on-the-bush-song-machinehead/

Here are the lyrics to the song:

"Machines Said" (to the tune of Bush's "Machinehead")

Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha

Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha

 

Vote in, vote out

Vote in, vote out

Vote in

Vote in, vote out

Vote in, vote out

Vote in

 

Begging for repeal, Lindell wants to steal

Smother our voices with his fluff

Down the rabbit hole, he spins to the right

A cokehead in a pillow fight

Oh, oh, flashbacks are here

He doesn’t know his pancreas from his ears

 

All the machines said Biden’s better than Trump

Blue states, red, machines said

All the machines said Biden’s better than Trump

Blue and red

 

I waltz by the machines

I waltz by the machines

 

Vote in, vote out

Vote in, vote out

Vote in

 

Crooked, obtuse, dirty, claims God believes this

He has no conscience at all

Lies are like lines, he snorts them all the time

The only God he ever sees is himself

 

All the machines said Biden’s better than Trump

Blue states, red, machines said

All the machines said Biden’s better than Trump

Blue and red, ha

 

I waltz by the machines

I waltz by the machines

 

Vote in, vote out

Vote in, vote out

Vote in, vote in, vote in

 

All the machines said Biden’s better than Trump

Blue states, red, machines said

All the machines said Biden’s better than Trump

Blue and red

He’s better than Trump

He’s better than Trump

Machines said, said, said, said, said, said

 

I waltz by the machines

I waltz by the machines

 

Once again, the song can be heard at this link - https://ifeelsnitty.podbean.com/e/machines-said-parody-based-on-the-bush-song-machinehead/

 

Labels

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun...
2 comments
Read more

Face guarding is legal in college football and the NFL

I just wanted to remind fans and announcers especially, that face guarding is legal in both college football and the NFL. It all comes down to contact. So long as a defender doesn't make contact with an intended receiver, he doesn't have to turn around to play the ball. I can't tell you how many times every week I hear announcers talk about face guarding being a penalty. It's not. I even heard one announcer yesterday state, "If the defender doesn't turn around and play the ball, the ref will call pass interference every time." That's simply not true. Courtesy of referee Bill LeMonnier, he says this with regard to the rule at the college level (answered on 8/12/13): "NCAA rules on pass interference require the face guarding to have contact to be a foul. No contact, no foul by NCAA rules." In the NFL rule book, this is written:  "Actions that constitute defensive pass interference include but are not limited to: (a) Contact by a ...
2 comments
Read more