Skip to main content

Bryce Harper's facepalm-worthy comments

I personally have nothing against Washington Nationals' right fielder Bryce Harper. He's one of the game's most exciting and promising young stars. Harper's having a breakout year at the plate, is improving defensively, and is on his way to leading his Nationals to another playoff appearance. However, every now and again, Harper makes me shake my head when listening to a post-game comment of his. Such was the case yesterday, after the Los Angeles Dodgers defeated the Nationals by the count of 5-0, as Dodgers ace Zack Greinke extended his scoreless innings streak to 43 2/3, lowering his ERA to a major league best 1.30 in the process.

After the game, Harper said, "For me, I don't think he (Greinke) was very tough."

He also said, "...when you're getting 6 inches off the plate, it's tough to face him."

Lastly, Harper added, "I don't want to give him too much credit because I gotta face him again."

For the game, Greinke allowed 3 hits (all singles), no runs, and struck out 11 while walking 1 in eight innings of work. For the year, he's allowed just 87 hits in 131.1 innings, 19 earned runs, and has struck out 117, compared to walking just 21 (5.57 K : BB ratio). His ERA is at 1.30, WHIP is at 0.82, and his batting average against is at .187. Greinke is 9-2 overall and 4-1 in his last eight starts. In that span, here are his stats: 58.1 innings pitched, 33 hits, 3 earned runs, 57 strikeouts, 6 walks (9.5 K : BB ratio), 0.46 ERA,  and 0.67 WHIP.

Bryce Harper may be a great young talent and (rightly) think of himself as such, but the guy needs to learn how to handle losing a bit better and how to give opponents their due respect. Zack Greinke is pitching better than anyone in baseball at the moment and could be well on his way to a Cy Young award. It's understandable for Harper to be frustrated after his team got shut down by two of the game's best, in Clayton Kershaw and Zack Greinke, but the last thing he wants to do is make enemies of the team that just handled his, especially if they should meet in the playoffs. Now whenever the Dodgers face the Nationals, especially if Greinke is on the mound, the rest of the team will circle that (those) game(s) on the calendar and say, "Harper said Greinke isn't very tough; let's show them that Harper isn't very tough himself!" The next time, instead of making excuses for both his and his team's poor performance at the plate, Harper needs to simply stand up and say, "He (Greinke) got the best of me and us today, but we'll watch tape, make some adjustments, and try to get the better of him next time."

http://espn.go.com/mlb/story/_/id/13285990/bryce-harper-says-zack-greinke-got-umpire-help-not-very-tough

http://espn.go.com/mlb/player/_/id/5883/zack-greinke

http://www.baseball-reference.com/players/g/greinza01.shtml

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"