Skip to main content

Marco Rubio is obviously a comedian...

During the tenth Republican presidential debate on Thursday night, Florida Senator Marco Rubio made me laugh. Yes, this was unintentional on his part, but at the time, I sarcastically thought to myself, "If this whole presidential thing doesn't work out, I think Rubio's found a back-up plan - stand-up comedy."

Here's the quote which garnered a chuckle out of me:

"The media has a definition of Hispanics that you can only be Hispanic if you're a liberal. The Obama economy has done enormous damage to the Spanish community.

On this stage tonight are two sons of Cuban immigrants and an African American. We are the party of diversity, not the Democrats."

Yes, because the final two Democratic presidential hopefuls are both white and three of the five remaining Republican candidates aren't, this obviously means Republicans are the party of diversity, not Democrats. That is if we don't look at the bigger picture, of course. Let's look a bit closer at Senator Rubio's claim...

House of Representative minorities
Democrats: 78 out of 188 seats (41.5%)
Republicans: 12 out of 246 seats (4.9%)

Both houses of Congress (minorities)
Democrats: 81 (34.6%)
Republicans: 16 (5.3%)

Both houses of Congress (women)
Democrats: 79 (33.8%)
Republicans: 29 (9.7%)

Not only that, but let's look at the 2012 election results, shall we?

Democrat Barack Obama won the following demographics over Republican challenger Mitt Romney:

- Women (55% to 44%)
- African-Americans (93% to 6%)
- Hispanics (71% to 27%)
- Asians (73% to 26%)
- Other (58% to 38%)

Senator Rubio, care to rebut my factual findings?

- "About 2 in 5 House Democrats are minorities and 1 in 20 House Republicans are. We are the party of diversity, not the Democrats!"

- "Over 1 in 3 Democratic Congresspeople are women and 1 in 10 Republican Congresspeople are. We are the party of diversity, not the Democrats!"

- "Democrats tend to win with these voters on election day: Women, African-Americans, Hispanics, Asians, and whoever 'other' is. We are the party of diversity, not the Democrats!"

- "While Democrats tend to disagree with us on these issues, most Republican politicians believe in the following: Deporting Hispanics, banning Muslims (our presidential frontrunner anyway), limiting LGBT rights, decreasing women's rights, and making it more difficult for blacks to vote. We are the party of diversity, not the Democrats!"

- "If you don't look at our quotes, proposals, voting records, look at the actual numbers, or use any common sense, you will see that we are the party of diversity, not the Democrats!"

Like I said, the guy should really think about going into comedy...

https://newrepublic.com/minutes/130549/we-party-diversity-says-marco-rubio-completely-without-irony

http://thekind-heartedsmartaleck.blogspot.com/2015/10/democrats-lack-diversity.html

http://ropercenter.cornell.edu/polls/us-elections/how-groups-voted/how-groups-voted-2012/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun...

Mentioned on Crooks and Liars and Hinterland Gazette!

Due to some tweets of mine, I got mentioned on the following two sites (all my tweets can be viewed here -  https://twitter.com/CraigRozniecki ): https://crooksandliars.com/2019/04/trump-gives-stupid-advice-george https://hinterlandgazette.com/2019/03/istandwithschiff-is-trending-after-donald-trump-led-gop-attack-on-adam-schiff-backfires-spectacularly.html

Face guarding is legal in college football and the NFL

I just wanted to remind fans and announcers especially, that face guarding is legal in both college football and the NFL. It all comes down to contact. So long as a defender doesn't make contact with an intended receiver, he doesn't have to turn around to play the ball. I can't tell you how many times every week I hear announcers talk about face guarding being a penalty. It's not. I even heard one announcer yesterday state, "If the defender doesn't turn around and play the ball, the ref will call pass interference every time." That's simply not true. Courtesy of referee Bill LeMonnier, he says this with regard to the rule at the college level (answered on 8/12/13): "NCAA rules on pass interference require the face guarding to have contact to be a foul. No contact, no foul by NCAA rules." In the NFL rule book, this is written:  "Actions that constitute defensive pass interference include but are not limited to: (a) Contact by a ...