Skip to main content

Twitter followers to avoid (and/or block)

While I have thoroughly enjoyed my Twitter experience to this point, I am quite thankful of the "block" option, especially when it comes to the following demographics:

PA (Pacifieroholics Anonymous): Unless we're talking about our own children, I can't think of a time when a person would say, "You know who I love more than anyone else? Whiners!" Just the other day, I posted a link to an article which a follower didn't find interesting, so she felt the need to comment, saying, "Are you ever going to post anything of importance? Seriously?" Really? If she had read the article and wanted to make a comment about it, so be it, but of what point is there, other than whining, to go out of her way to complain about an article's title which doesn't intrigue her? So, as I typically do, I handed her a pacifier and carried on with my day.

Seriously serious: There are times I wonder if people even bother to read my profile before following me. I don't hide my identity or beliefs any. In my bio, I mention that I'm a satirist and think the Tea Party so crazy, a Long Island Iced Tea party would be more sane. So why some feel the need to follow me and criticize my satirical tweets as being offensive is beyond me. That'd be like me following a musician and tweeting to them, "Why do you always have to tweet about the instruments you play and the gigs you have? It's boring!" I mean, what do these people expect, for me, a satirist, to regularly tweet about the dictionary, encyclopedia, and periodic table? Actually, I do mention those in tweets on occasion, so nevermind...

Their friends' greatest enemy: I'm progressive and am leaning toward Bernie Sanders, however, am also realistic in thinking Hillary Clinton will be the Democratic nominee. I try not to show bias toward either candidate with my tweets, but do post news about them both. Whenever I post a positive story about Sanders, a handful of Clinton supporters will bash Bernie, and vice versa when I post a positive story about Clinton. Can't we all just get along, and by "we," I mean Democrats? Perhaps after a candidate gets rewarded with the party's nomination, the two can start a short bar-hopping reality series, entitled, Weekend At Hillary and Bernie's.

"I like long walks on the beach...and trolling": Who doesn't love trolls, right? Trolls are like construction: They always seem to be around, don't seem to do anything productive, and while there are days when things are going well and they don't phase you, there are other days when they're cause for a migraine. Fortunately, unlike with construction, we can block trolls.

"Sarcasm is like a foreign language or something...": While I'll be the first to admit that it's becoming increasingly more difficult to differentiate satire from reality at times, I'll also be the first to say it's incredibly sad how regularly this seems to occur. Even when I post articles by writers at The Onion or Andy Borowitz, I'll receive multiple angry comments, saying something along the lines of: "These people are sick!" or "How can we let this happen?!?" or "I can't believe this is true! On second thought, I can!" Oh, but I wish you wouldn't...

...to be continued... (well, maybe...)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun...

Mentioned on Crooks and Liars and Hinterland Gazette!

Due to some tweets of mine, I got mentioned on the following two sites (all my tweets can be viewed here -  https://twitter.com/CraigRozniecki ): https://crooksandliars.com/2019/04/trump-gives-stupid-advice-george https://hinterlandgazette.com/2019/03/istandwithschiff-is-trending-after-donald-trump-led-gop-attack-on-adam-schiff-backfires-spectacularly.html

Face guarding is legal in college football and the NFL

I just wanted to remind fans and announcers especially, that face guarding is legal in both college football and the NFL. It all comes down to contact. So long as a defender doesn't make contact with an intended receiver, he doesn't have to turn around to play the ball. I can't tell you how many times every week I hear announcers talk about face guarding being a penalty. It's not. I even heard one announcer yesterday state, "If the defender doesn't turn around and play the ball, the ref will call pass interference every time." That's simply not true. Courtesy of referee Bill LeMonnier, he says this with regard to the rule at the college level (answered on 8/12/13): "NCAA rules on pass interference require the face guarding to have contact to be a foul. No contact, no foul by NCAA rules." In the NFL rule book, this is written:  "Actions that constitute defensive pass interference include but are not limited to: (a) Contact by a ...