Skip to main content

Twitter followers to avoid (and/or block)

While I have thoroughly enjoyed my Twitter experience to this point, I am quite thankful of the "block" option, especially when it comes to the following demographics:

PA (Pacifieroholics Anonymous): Unless we're talking about our own children, I can't think of a time when a person would say, "You know who I love more than anyone else? Whiners!" Just the other day, I posted a link to an article which a follower didn't find interesting, so she felt the need to comment, saying, "Are you ever going to post anything of importance? Seriously?" Really? If she had read the article and wanted to make a comment about it, so be it, but of what point is there, other than whining, to go out of her way to complain about an article's title which doesn't intrigue her? So, as I typically do, I handed her a pacifier and carried on with my day.

Seriously serious: There are times I wonder if people even bother to read my profile before following me. I don't hide my identity or beliefs any. In my bio, I mention that I'm a satirist and think the Tea Party so crazy, a Long Island Iced Tea party would be more sane. So why some feel the need to follow me and criticize my satirical tweets as being offensive is beyond me. That'd be like me following a musician and tweeting to them, "Why do you always have to tweet about the instruments you play and the gigs you have? It's boring!" I mean, what do these people expect, for me, a satirist, to regularly tweet about the dictionary, encyclopedia, and periodic table? Actually, I do mention those in tweets on occasion, so nevermind...

Their friends' greatest enemy: I'm progressive and am leaning toward Bernie Sanders, however, am also realistic in thinking Hillary Clinton will be the Democratic nominee. I try not to show bias toward either candidate with my tweets, but do post news about them both. Whenever I post a positive story about Sanders, a handful of Clinton supporters will bash Bernie, and vice versa when I post a positive story about Clinton. Can't we all just get along, and by "we," I mean Democrats? Perhaps after a candidate gets rewarded with the party's nomination, the two can start a short bar-hopping reality series, entitled, Weekend At Hillary and Bernie's.

"I like long walks on the beach...and trolling": Who doesn't love trolls, right? Trolls are like construction: They always seem to be around, don't seem to do anything productive, and while there are days when things are going well and they don't phase you, there are other days when they're cause for a migraine. Fortunately, unlike with construction, we can block trolls.

"Sarcasm is like a foreign language or something...": While I'll be the first to admit that it's becoming increasingly more difficult to differentiate satire from reality at times, I'll also be the first to say it's incredibly sad how regularly this seems to occur. Even when I post articles by writers at The Onion or Andy Borowitz, I'll receive multiple angry comments, saying something along the lines of: "These people are sick!" or "How can we let this happen?!?" or "I can't believe this is true! On second thought, I can!" Oh, but I wish you wouldn't...

...to be continued... (well, maybe...)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"