Skip to main content

Zen Master Phil Jackson gets deep on Twitter ...

Former Chicago Bulls and Los Angeles Lakers head coach and current New York Knicks president, Phil Jackson, recently took to Twitter to comment on defending champ Golden State's MVP point guard Stephen Curry's outstanding play, saying, "Never seen anything like SCurry? Remind you of Chris Jackson/Mahmoud Abdul-Rauf, who had a short but brilliant run in NBA?"

Yeah, the Zen Master may want to think a bit more carefully before making such a tweet... Since Jackson brought it up, let's compare the two players, shall we?

Mahmoud Abdul-Rauf

- 9 seasons

- 586 games, 336 started (three different teams: Denver, Sacramento, and Vancouver)

- 3,514-7,943 field goals (.442)

- 474-1,339 3-pointers (.354)

- 1,051-1,161 free throws (.905)

- 1,087 rebounds (1.9 p/gm)

- 2,079 assists (3.5 p/gm)

- 487 steals (0.8 p/gm)

- 46 blocks (0.1 p/gm)

- 8,553 points (14.6 p/gm)

- 15 playoff games (13.0 PPG, 1.5 RPG, 2.3 APG, 0.1 SPG, 0.1 BPG, 369 FG%, .286 3PT%, .956 FT%)

- 1993 most improved player

- 0 all-star games

- 0 MVPs

- 0 championships


Stephen Curry

- 7th season

- 477 games, 466 started (one team: Golden State)

- 3,686-7,725 field goals (.477)

- 1,479-3,319 3-pointers (.446)

- 1,581-1,754 free throws (.901)

- 2,015 rebounds (4.4 p/gm)

- 3,238 assists (7.1 p/gm)

- 835 steals (1.8 p/gm)

- 102 blocks (0.2 p/gm)

- 10,432 points (22.8 p/gm)

- 40 playoff games (25.9 PPG, 4.4 RPG, 7.3 APG, 1.8 SPG, 0.2 BPG, .447 FG%, .410 3PT%, .862 FT%)

- 2010 NBA All-Rookie First Team

- 2014 All-NBA Second Team

- 2015 All-NBA First Team

- 2015 NBA Three-Point Contest champion

- 2015 NBA Most Valuable Playor

- 2015 AP Athlete of the Year

- 2015 NBA champion

- 3 All-Star game appearances (2014-2016)

Mahmoud Abdul-Rauf wasn't a bad player by any stretch of the imagination. He was was quick off the dribble, had a smooth and quick release, was a solid outside shooter, and was arguably one of the best free throw shooters of all-time. Having said that, however, to say he was in the same league as Stephen Curry would be like to say, "Nickelback is like the Beatles of our time, man." Abdul-Rauf was a decent role player, a good guy to bring off the bench, especially if the team needed some points from the outside or from the foul line, but the guy was largely a one-trick pony. For his career, he averaged a combined 6.3 rebounds, assists, steals, and blocks per game. Yes, that's all... He also never played in an All-Star game, never made an All-NBA team, was never named the league MVP, and never won a championship. Stephen Curry, on the other hand, has averaged a combined 13.5 rebounds, assists, steals, and blocks per game, has been invited to three All-Star games, was selected to two All-NBA teams, was named the AP Athlete of the Year once, won an MVP, and also led a team to a championship. The guy is also close to 10% more accurate than Abdul-Rauf from 3-point range. Besides all of that, they're like doppelgangers or something...

http://www.latimes.com/sports/sportsnow/la-sp-sn-phil-jackson-stephen-curry-20160229-story.html

http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/a/abdulma02.html

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mahmoud_Abdul-Rauf

http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/c/curryst01.html

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephen_Curry

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"