Skip to main content

#2017Predictions

I had some fun with the trending hashtag #2017Predictions on Twitter last night. Here are my posts, ordered from the most to the least popular (all my tweets can be seen here - https://twitter.com/CraigRozniecki):

1) Donald Trump's first State of the Union Address will last 140 characters or less.
#2017Predictions
526 Likes, 167 Retweets

2) A new game show will debut by the name of, "How Much Smarter Are You Than the American President?"
#2017Predictions
261 Likes, 82 Retweets

3) Jesus will come again, blurt out, "WTF, USA?!?" drop the mic, and leave.
#2017Predictions
183 Likes, 59 Retweets

4) Canada will want to build a wall and make America pay for it.
#2017Predictions
162 Likes, 56 Retweets

5) Donald Trump will respond, "Yes, bigly," when asked by Vladimir Putin, "Will you be my valentine?"
#2017Predictions
138 Likes, 55 Retweets

6) When Donald Trump asks for their phone nimbers, a record number of "10s" will tell him, "867-5309."
#2017Predictions
82 Likes, 13 Retweets

7) James Inhofe will get into a snowball fight in Antarctica and claim that it disproves global warming.
#2017Predictions
35 Likes, 11 Retweets

8) Mike Pence will star in the film, "Village of the Damned: The Kids Are All Grown Up."
#2017Predictions
23 Likes, 4 Retweets

8) Donald Trump will say, "It's rigged," after losing to Barron (Trump) in chess.
#2017Predictions
24 Likes, 3 Retweets

10) Donald Trump will spend an entire speech explaining why "euphenism" should be word of the year.
#2017Predictions
25 Likes, 1 Retweet

11) Billy Bush will star in the new show, "Dancing With the Pervs."
#2017Predictions
19 Likes, 3 Retweets

12) The former Dos Equis guy will challenge the new Dos Equis guy to an overhand bowling contest and kick his ass.
#2017Predictions
18 Likes, 2 Retweets

13) Dane Cook will finally finish a knock-knock joke he started in 2011.
#2017Predictions
14 Likes, 1 Retweet

14) The next viral trend challenge will be so lazy, it'll make the mannequin challenge look like a Forrest Gump marathon.
#2017Predictions
12 Likes, 1 Retweet

Totals: 1,522 Likes, 458 Retweets (Averages of 108.7 Likes, 32.7 Retweets)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"