Skip to main content

RIP, Senator McCain

There probably hasn't been a politician I've had more of a rollercoaster relationship with than John McCain, who passed away at the age of 81 this past Saturday. I tend to agree with Democratic politicians 67% to 90% of the time, while I only tend to agree with Republican politicians 0% to 25% of the time. John McCain, on the other hand, never seemed to fit in any single box. He was by no means progressive in his view of the world or how to improve our country, yet he was often called a RINO (Republican In Name Only) by those to his right on the political spectrum. Yes, John McCain was called "the maverick" for a reason.

I've always felt McCain's unsuccessful attempts at winning the presidency were largely centered around the fact he didn't fit in any neat little box, especially in our increasingly partisan times. When he ran in 2000, as audiences for Fox News and right-wing talk radio continued to increase, he was branded by these media outlets as "too liberal." This ultimately led to him pulling out of the race, as George W. Bush became the party's nominee. After the election and re-election of Bush, McCain's voting record and rhetoric appeared to shift to the right. This may very well have been due to the fact he knew he wanted to run for the highest office in the land once again. Branded as too liberal eight years prior, the Arizona Senator then decided to go the opposite route, and this strategy paid off for a time, as he became the Republican Party's nominee for the 2008 presidential election. Of course, these noticeable changes in voting, rhetoric, and branding harmed him in the lead-up to the general election, as Democratic nominee Barack Obama and his team were quick to point out McCain's flip-flops and contradictions, asking the country, "Which John McCain are we going to get? How can we know? Can we afford to take that risk?" That may have been the reason Obama held a slight lead on McCain before the start of the recession, at which point McCain, a member of the same party as the president at the time, ultimately became toast.

Since that time, McCain has talked about increasing our presence in wars overseas one day, leaving me to shake my head; before voting to maintain key components of the Affordable Care Act the next, leaving me to give him a thumb's up. This has been our relationship in a nutshell ever since I started following the world of politics. Through all twists and turns, ups and downs, though, while I've never voted for John McCain, I've always respected him. The man went through more in his 81 years than most anyone could experience in ten lifetimes. Hell, he endured more in those 5.5 years as a POW than most of us will experience in 81. John McCain was strong, brave, independent, and principled. I often may not have agreed with him on issues, but I always respected his position. While many politicians, especially on the right, tend to give in to conspiracy-loving supporters of theirs for financial purposes, McCain never gave into them. An iconic moment in the run up to the 2008 election exemplified this, as when the Arizona Senator was approached by a woman hurling Barack-Obama conspiracies at him during a rally, he took the mic away from her, and said unabashedly that her claims weren't true; that Obama was a good and decent family man; and that the two just held different viewpoints on how to move America forward. It would have been easy for him to have allowed the woman to finish her statement, to laugh off her ridiculousness, and not say anything to rebut the outlandish claims. That's not who John McCain was, though. Agree or disagree with him, he fought for what he believed was right, and what a fighter he was. The man frustrated me to no end at times during his political career, as I couldn't figure him out, but that's just who John McCain was, and both Congress and the world are going to sorely miss him. Both would be well served if we had more like him. RIP, Senator McCain. I rarely say this, as I don't want to come across as cliché and disingenuous, thank you for your service.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"