Skip to main content

Outfoxing Fox

As long-time readers should know, I can't stand Fox News. Excluding Shepard Smith and Chris Wallace, Fox News talking heads are notorious for spreading BS. There's a good reason why Fox News sounds so similar to fake news. Having said that, though, I don't understand the Democratic Party's reluctance on presenting town halls there.

One problem with the Democratic Party's electoral success at times has been their failure to reach out to rural, conservative-leaning Independent, and moderate Republican voters. No, it's not likely  Elizabeth Warren could be part of a Fox News-hosted town hall and be able to win over many regular viewers of the channel, but it couldn't hurt.

Bernie Sanders, arguably the most liberal member of Congress, took part in a Fox News-hosted town hall not too long ago, and guess what? He received rave reviews. While I didn't hear any Fox News regulars yell out, "Bernie 2020!," I did hear several say something along the lines of, "You know what? I still don't agree with him on most things, but after seeing him and hearing what he has to say, he doesn't seem as bad as I had thought. He actually seems like a nice guy. I won't vote for him, but I won't be frightened if he gets elected."

That's the thing. Fox News has been brainwashing its viewers for nearly a quarter of a century. Their typical audience has bought into the nonsense they've spewed about the Democratic Party and specific members of it. Barack Obama? Oh, he was born in Kenya and is a Muslim. The Clintons? They killed Vince Foster. Bernie Sanders? He's a socialist through and through. This is what they hear on a daily basis. As the mere-exposure effect suggests, the more you hear something, regardless of its level of accuracy, the more likely you are to believe it. So how does the Democratic Party alter the caricature Fox News has presented them as over the past 23 years? Not by ignoring the channel completely. This will allow commentators to exacerbate the already distorted image they've presented to the public for 2+ decades. The only way they alter this distorted image and in a positive manner is by playing Fox News on their turf. Bernie Sanders did it and was largely successful. Why shouldn't other Democratic candidates follow suit? We can't change people's minds about our party and policy ideas if we ignore them. Fox News has demonized the Democratic Party and its members to the point where we're seen in a light similar to that of the devil by many conservative Republicans. According to regular Fox News viewers, Democrats: Encourage abortions; want guns stripped from law-abiding citizens; will double the income tax rate; have a dream to become the mirror image of Venezuela; hate law enforcement; etc. Of course none of these things are true, but the only way we'll be able to convince any Fox viewers of this is to outfox Fox.

The fact of the matter is a large majority of Americans believe in expanding background checks for firearm purchases; legalizing marijuana; Medicare for all (healthcare reform in general); criminal justice reform; increasing taxes for the wealthiest; etc. These policies are all regularly supported by Democrats. Just look at the Fox News Bernie Sanders town hall. When the crowd was asked about their private insurance and if they'd be willing to trade that for a government-run program like Medicare for all, a rather large majority applauded. Republican leaders often times misrepresent the Democratic Party via a fictional liberal they had nightmares about throughout the week. This provides GOPers with a very negative, yet very general image of the party. If we confront them and get into specifics, I think it could make a big difference, both in terms of perception and votes. Donald Trump largely won the 2016 election because he made forgotten voters feel relevant again. It's time the Democratic Party did similarly. Whether we win over a person's vote in the near-term or not, the first step is letting them know they're relevant and haven't been forgotten. One path to doing this is by turning the fake news reported by Fox News on its head and showing its audience  that "fair and balanced" is more than just a deceptive slogan.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"