Skip to main content

The N-word vs. "Honky" debate

I recently heard about a person contending that television had a double-standard on slurs, as while they'd bleep out the n-word, they'd air the term "honky." I then had a friendly debate with a third party about the matter.

First off, if we want to purely look at things from a black-and-white perspective (no pun intended), all slurs are bad. However, as is almost always the case, things are more complex than that.

There are several reasons why the n-word is regarded as a more offensive slur than "honky," the biggest of which is historical context. The etymology of honky is unclear. One theory is that the term originated in Oak Hill, West Virginia, where coal miners were segregated into three groups: 1) Whites, 2) Blacks, and 3) Non-English-speaking whites knows as "Hunk Hill." Another theory is that the term started in the meat-packing plants of Chicago, where black employees referred to white employees as "honkies." Yet another theory is that the term first revolved around white people honking their car horns to garner attention. Regardless of the term's actual etymology, it's tended to be regarded as derogatory towards whites, but has also been affiliated with country music (honkytonk), has become much less common in usage over the decades, and if a white person were to ever get called "honky" on the street by a random person nowadays, I have a wild hunch he'd showcase a look of utter bemusement, potentially chuckling in the process.

The history of the n-word is far different. During the times of slavery, what were black slaves often called by their masters? The n-word. When they were whipped, what were they often called? The n-word. As a side note, the slur "cracker" actually derives from the cracking of the whips used on black slaves by their white masters. When blacks were hung or beaten by white supremacists, what were they often called? The n-word. Sadly, the n-word carries with it the history of slavery, physical abuse, murder, and more recently, the suppression of human/Constitutional rights. At least in this country, the term honky has no such history. There was never a point when black masters in this country called their white slaves by that name. There was never a time when, as they were whipping the backs of their white slaves, black masters called them "honkies." No matter the current usage of the terms, while they may both be similarly bad on the surface, history renders them starkly different when digging a little deeper. While country music will commonly come to mind when a black person calls a white person a "honky," slavery, beatings, and death commonly come to mind when a white person calls a black person the n-word. There's a good reason why people know the n-word as just that. They'd have no idea what you were talking about if you referred to "honky" as the h-word. Period.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"