Skip to main content

Transcript for Podcast: "I Feel Snitty," Episode 66: "Cognitive Dysfunction Junction" is now available!

Podcast: "I Feel Snitty"

Episode 66: Cognitive Dysfunction Junction

Premiere Date: 8/6/20

Length: 12:27 (1,759 words)


Transcript: 

Welcome to I Feel Snitty, episode 66, entitled, “Cognitive Dysfunction Junction.” I’m 

your host, Craig Rozniecki.

During an interview with Marc Siegel of Fox News a couple of weeks ago, Donald 

Trump talked about how he aced the Montreal Cognitive Assessment at Walter Reed 

National Military Medical Center in 2018. On multiple occasions, he bragged about 

having to remember the following five words: person, woman, man, camera, TV. He 

made it sound as though it was an IQ test and he scored higher than anyone 

previously. In actuality, the test is used to detect cognitive impairment – early 

Alzheimer’s in particular. This peaked my curiosity, so I decided to research this 

particular test, and share an exaggerated version of it with you. Here now is how I 

envision Donald Trump responded to all of the questions on the test. The interviewer 

will be played by yours truly. …and action…

Have you heard about the sobriety test and having to recite the alphabet backwards? 

Okay, well, forget that. What comes first in the alphabet, B or Z?

Trump: “Do do do do do do do. A, B, C, G. E, F, D. Okay, B. Final answer.”

That’s correct. When counting, what comes before 1 million: 500 million, 1 billion, 70 

trillion, or 2?

Trump: “Could you repeat those numbers?”

Yes: 500 million, 1 billion, 70 trillion, and 2.

Trump: “Okay, and what about them?”

Which of them comes before the number 1 million?

Trump: “…and the numbers again?”

This is the last time I will repeat the numbers. They are: 500 million, 1 billion, 70 

trillion, and 2.

Trump: “Okay, well, 500 is more than 1 and so is 70, so those can’t be it. That must 

mean 1 billion is the same as 1 million, so that’s not it either. I’ll go with 2.”

Well, that’s one way of going about it. Yes, the answer is 2 – 2 is less than 1 million. 

Next question: do you see this circle? With us giving you the writing utensil, paper, and 

this picture, draw what you see. You can even trace it if you’d like.

Trump: “What do you mean by trace?”

This picture. You see this thing right here? Draw it.

Trump: “With this pencil thing?”

Yes, with that pencil thing.

Trump: “What if it runs out of ink?”

Please believe me when I tell you it won’t run out of ink.

Trump: “Here you go. Did I do good?”

Eh, it’s passable for a 2-year-old.

Trump: “Good. I was worried about that one. I’ve never been good at painting.”

You didn’t… nevermind. What time is it? You can use a watch, cell phone, the Internet, 

or phone a friend if you so prefer.

Trump: “Right now”

Yes, right now.

Trump: “No, that’s the time – right now.”

No, what is the time right now?

Trump: “That”

What?

Trump: “Right now.”

Screw it. I’ll write this one down for you.

Trump: “What’s that?”

It says 2:41. That’s the current time.

Trump: “Yeah, right now.”

Yes.

Trump: “So I was right.”

Ugh. Okay, before my head explodes, let’s get to the next question. What are these 

three animals? Along with the pictures, I’ll describe each of them for you. The first one 

is large, grey, is known for its trunk and tusks, and is the logo for the Republican 

Party.

Trump: “That one’s easy – Mitch McConnell.”

Very funny, but seriously, what’s your answer? I’ll give you another hint: the word 

rhymes with pellaphant.

Trump: “Oh, elephant.”

Yes. Second, this animal swings around in the jungle, makes the sound ooh-ooh-eee-

eee, and can be used as a racist term describing black people.

Trump: “Monkey”

Wow, you got that one fast.

Trump: “I’m always fast. Just ask the ladies.”

No thanks, mushroom man.

Trump: “What?”

Oh, nothing. Lastly, this dog goes woof woof. Oh, I guess I gave you the answer. So, 

anyway, what is it?

Trump: “What is what? The name of the dog?”

No, forget it. You already said it.

Trump: “Said what?”

The right answer – dog.

Trump: “What’s that?”

You’re just messing with me, aren’t you?

Trump: “What do you mean?”

Don’t worry about it. Now read these random five words and then repeat them twice. I. 

Have. A. Tiny. Penis. Again, that’s I. Have. A. Tiny. Penis.

Trump: “I. Have. :: pause :: A. Tiny. Penis. I ::pause :: Have. A. :: pause :: Tiny Penis.”

Well done. Now repeat these random numbers in the forward order: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. That’s 

1. 2. 3. 4. 5.

Trump: “1. 2. 3. 45. No, wait. Give me a minute. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Yeah, there it is.”

Now repeat the following numbers in the backward order: 10. 9. 8. Again, that’s 10. 9. 

8.

Trump: “7”

What?

Trump: “That’s the next number.”

Okay, yes, but that’s not what I asked of you. Repeat the numbers 10. 9. 8. in the 

backward order.

Trump: “10. 9. 8. Backwards.”

Sure, let’s go with that. I’m now going to read a list of letters. Every time I read the 

letter “Q,” you must say, “I’m sorry.” If you mess up two or more times in this section, 

you will be rewarded 0 points. Q, A, M, B, R… You already messed up once.”

Trump: “But I didn’t say anything.”

Like I said, whenever I utter the letter “Q,” you have to say, “I’m sorry.” If you mess up 

one more time, you won’t receive any points for this section.

Trump: “Okay, I think I got it now, I think.”

Good. Here we go… V, W, X, C, D, Q

Trump: “Wait, hold up. I’m supposed to say something here.”

I’m sorry.

Trump: “For what?”

No, that’s what you have to say.

Trump: “Oh yeah, you’re sorry.”

No, I’m sorry.

Trump: “That’s what I said – you’re sorry.”

Okay, you’re sorry.

Trump: “Why would I be sorry?”

Oh, f*ck it. You pass the section. Moving on. Now I want you to subtract from 100 

using multiples of 10. I’ll get it started for you. You know, so like 100, 90, 80, 70, 60, 

50, 40, 30, 20, 10, and 0. Got it? Okay, now you go.

Trump: “What are multiples?”

You have go to be kidding me.

Trump: “No, seriously, what are they?”

…and you pass this section.

Trump: “That was easy.”

If only you knew…

Trump: “What?”

Exactly. I’m now going to ask you to repeat two sentences I will read to you. Here’s the 

first one: I got impeached by the House, bigly.

Trump: “I got impeached by the House, bigly. But it was a fake impeachment, fake 

House, and fake bigly, believe me.”

Okay then. The second sentence reads: Donald Trump is a lying, stinky pile of pig sh*t.

Trump: “Donald Trump is a lying, stinky pile of big sh*t.”

Well, it was pig sh*t, but I’m going to accept that answer. I’ll now give you a minute to 

tell me as many words as you can which end with the letter “S.” Starting now…

Trump: “Seven”

No, end with the letter “s,” not begin with it.

Trump: “Okay, so six.”

That “s” comes at the beginning of the word. I’m asking for words which end in “s.”

Trump: “Covfefes, hamberders, smockings…”

That shall suffice. For this next section, you’re going to need to tell me what these 

three pairs of words have in common.

Trump: “Wait, what’s that word you used? Self-ice? What’s that mean?”

Suffice. Look it up.

Trump: “What, in a book?”

Sure, or the Internet.

Trump: “I think you might be making up words. Is it a fake word? Only I know the best 

words.”

Can we please move on? We’re almost done. Finally. Anyway, what do these two words 

have in common - Barack Obama and Abraham Lincoln?

Trump: “They were both black.”

Is that really the answer you want to go with?

Trump: “No, no. They were both slaves.”

Let’s keep trying.

Trump: “They were both presidents with fake birth certificates.”

They were both presidents, so yeah, sure, you got part of it right. The next two words 

are Kansas and Arkansas.

Trump: “They both end in ‘s.’”

Where was that earlier?

Trump: “What do you mean?”

Screw it. They’re both states, but I will give you that answer. Lastly, what do football 

and basketball have in common?

Trump: “Lots of traitors kneeling during the anthem, who should be sent back to their 

home countries.”

Most of them were born here, but no, that’s not what we’re looking for.

Trump: “Something to do with men playing with balls.”

They’re both sports, so yeah, that will be accepted.

Okay, for the final time, tell me the five random words I asked you to repeat earlier.

Trump: “I. Have. A. Very. Tiny. Penis.”

Yes! …and we are done!

Trump: “How’d I do? 100 percenters? Top of my class? Valid DeLorean?”

Not exactly, but I don’t think you have Alzheimer’s, so that’s good.

Trump: “So that means I have like the highest IQ, the bigliest brain of all time?”

If you say so. Now I think it’s time for a drink.

Trump: “But I don’t drink.”

Exactly. Good day.

 

From Snark to Finish: Yo-Semite Sam

For my from snark to finish segment this week, I bring to you more of the stable genius 

that is Donald J. Trump. When speaking at the White House after signing the Great 

American Outdoors Act on Tuesday, Trump mispronounced Yosemite National Park 

not once, but twice. Here’s his quote:

"When young Americans experience the breathtaking beauty of the Grand Canyon, 

when their eyes widen in amazement as Old Faithful bursts into the sky, when they 

gaze upon yo-Semites, yo-Semites, towering sequoias, their love of country grows 

stronger, and they know that every American has truly a duty to preserve this 

wonderous inheritance."

Apparently Trump was having a case of the terrible Tuesdays. In the future, expect him 

to mispronounce the following words:

- Lincoln = Lynn's colon

- Peru = Pee - are you?

- Louisiana = Lou is an Anna

- Indiana = In Diana

- Pennsylvania = Penis vans? Yeah.

- Jerusalem = Juries in Salem

- Guatemala = Guacamole

- Tokyo = Taco Bell

- Sudan = Already did. Wait, which Dan?

- Iceland = You see? No global warming.

That’s it for today’s episode. I’ll see you again next week. Until then, you can check me 

out on Podbean, Twitter, Amazon, and Blogger. This has been I Feel Snitty with Craig 

Rozniecki. Take care.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"