Skip to main content

Acirema: The bass ackwardsness of America

The bass ackwardsness of America has reached such a dire point, it’d be appropriate to now refer to the country as Acirema.

It started when whites stole the land from Natives, yet we claim it’s the freest country in the history of the world. In addition to that, as we read the Ten Commandments – especially “Thou shalt not steal” – we contend this is a Christian nation. Oh, and these very immigrants who stole the land from Natives are now saying we should build a wall to keep out other immigrants.

We brought slaves in from Africa; “progressed” by referring to them as three-fifths of a person; and then “freed” them into a system which had already been stacked against them – again while shouting that this was the freest country in the history of the world.

In the so-called freest country in the history of the world, it’s commonplace for law to permit men to dictate what women can and cannot do with their bodies, yet not vice versa. It’s common for the richest among us to be provided tax shortcuts and loopholes, which result in them paying less than those without one car, let alone 9 or 10 of them. There has tended to be a legal double-standard for whites and non-whites. Members of the LGBT community are still prohibited from placing on uniforms and fighting for our country. If a self-described Christian goes on a mass shooting spree, he tends to be labeled a “disturbed” individual, yet if a self-described Muslim were to do the same, he’s branded a “terrorist.”

When it comes to elections, this freest country in the history of the world doesn’t necessarily reward the presidency to the person with the most votes. If Amy Coney Barrett is confirmed as a Supreme Court Justice, over 50% of the judges of the highest court in the land (5 of 9) would have been nominated and confirmed by presidents who received fewer votes on election day than their opponents.

In the freest country in the history of the world, the president is doing everything in his power to suppress the vote – this while claiming to be spreading democracy across all other parts of the world. He’s attempting to strip healthcare from millions, while implementing more lax gun laws, for to him, while gun ownership is a right, healthcare is a privilege. Oddly enough, given this logic, the “president” is essentially saying, “If a person shoots another, that’s their right. Whether or not the victim can afford treatment, however, that all comes down to privilege.”

Confederates have seemingly risen from the ashes in an attempt to revise this country’s history, contending they won the Civil War. This “fake news” has become ubiquitous, but not in the same manner the “president” claims. Scientific studies are now often branded as biased, whereas debunked Russian propaganda and conspiracy theories are viewed as valid. Fact-checkers are dismissed, as they’re seen as part of the “lame-stream media,” while edited YouTube clips are labeled as “proof.”

Then there’s faux-patriotic symbolism. Just because one wears a shirt with a flag on it or stands for an anthem doesn’t make them patriotic, just as sporting a bumper-sticker with the message “eating animals is murder” doesn’t make one a vegetarian. I could shout to the entire neighborhood, through a megaphone, that I’m a vegan all I want. If I’m eating a filet mignon while doing that, it seems quite obvious my words aren’t genuine. Similarly, a person can say they’re “Christian,” “patriotic,” or that they support the troops, but if their actions run contrary to said rhetoric, their words would have been meaningless. Speaking of flags, in the U.S. flag code, it’s written that it’s actually disrespectful to sport the flag emblem on apparel, while it says nothing about kneeling during the anthem. Also, if a flag is in tatters, the recommended method of disposal is through the burning of it.

Peaceful protests should be allowed, but always trust a cop’s word over an unarmed black man’s, and if one protester gets out of hand at a Black Lives Matter march, all protesters are out of line and should be stopped.

All of these brainwashing techniques have been sadly rather successful in Acirema. People are doubting science; believing in debunked conspiracy theories; buying into Russian propaganda at the behest of American foundations and principles; and turning the alleged freest country in the history of the world into a parody of itself – a hybrid of a dictatorship and an Idiocracy. The only way we can prevent it from being such is by getting out there and voting. Do we want to follow through with an ideal vision of the USA or do we want to devolve into the USSR? Acirema has been the freest country in the history of the world for just one demographic – straight, rich, white, “Christian” men. Freedom that isn’t for all is freedom that is for none, so let’s make sure we utilize a freedom still in our possession before it slips from our grasp – VOTE!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"