Skip to main content

"The Kansas City Chiefs defense has always been bad!" Not this bad...

One of the NFL's hottest topics in recent weeks has been, "What is wrong with the Kansas City Chiefs?" To my surprise, it seems that most analysts place the brunt of the blame on the team's offense - more specifically, quarterback Patrick Mahomes. They tend to then rebut dissenters by saying, "Their defense has always been bad! What they had was an offense that could compensate for it!"

They're partially right, but not telling the whole story. The Chiefs offense needs some work. The offensive line ranks as one of the worst (if not the worst) in all of football. They've all but abandoned the run game. They're still trying to find that third go-to target in the passing game, outside of Tyreek Hill and Travis Kelce. In addition to that, Patrick Mahomes has thrown 3-4 of the worst interceptions I can ever remember seeing. Having said that, the offense isn't the biggest concern for Andy Reid and company.

Ever since Mahomes has taken over as starting quarterback for the Kansas City Chiefs, the team has made a deep playoff run. In his first season (2018), they advanced to the AFC Championship game. They were Super Bowl champions in 2019 and the runner-up in 2020. The defense was never elite in those three postseason runs, but they were never this bad. Out of 32 teams, the Chiefs ranked an average of 23rd among these four categories in 2018: yards allowed per play, pass yards per attempt, rush yards per carry, and points allowed per game. In their Super Bowl year, that number improved to 14th. Last year, it decreased slightly to 17th. So, out of 32 teams, the Kansas City Chiefs defense averaged to rank 18th over the past 3 seasons - so a little below the halfway point. This year? That number is 29th. They are near or at dead last in all four categories. Total yards allowed per play? 32nd (6.6 p/). Pass yards per attempt? 30th (8.0 p/). Rush yards per carry? 27th (4.7 p/). Points allowed per game? 27th (29.0). 

The Kansas City Chiefs are allowing nearly 30 points per game, almost a first down on every pass attempt (not completion, attempt), close to 7 yards a play, and close to half a first down per rush. I don't care how good an offense is, you're not going to win many games with a defense THAT bad. The offense definitely needs to make some adjustments, but guess what? To this point, they haven't been afforded the time to do so. It's hard to work in a run game when the defense gives up two early touchdowns. It's difficult to not feel added pressure to score on every possession due to this, which leads to an increase in penalties and turnovers. The line needs to better protect Mahomes; he needs to stop forcing balls that aren't there; and Reid needs to work in a run game to give the defense a breather every now and again, but the onus of this 3-4 record is on the defense - arguably the worst in all of football. The Chiefs defense may not have ever been great these past 4 seasons, but there's a stark difference between middle-of-the-pack and dead last.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"