Skip to main content

Transcript for Podcast: "I Feel Snitty," Episode 194: "Can You Hear Me Now? Part 1" is now available!

Podcast: I Feel Snitty

Episode 194: Can You Hear Me Now? Part 1

Premiere Date: 6/10/2022

Length: 7:25 (1,120 words)

Link: https://ifeelsnitty.podbean.com/e/can-you-hear-me-now-part-1/

Transcript: 

Welcome to I Feel Snitty, episode 194, entitled, “Can You Hear Me Now? Part 1.” I’m your host, Craig Rozniecki.

 

The first of seven scheduled hearings, in regard to the January 6th attack on the U.S. Capitol, took place last night. Here are my immediate takeaways from it.

 

1) McCarthyism: In a prebuttal, House Minority Leader and man voted least likely to be a leader of minorities – Kevin McCarthy, said this of the January 6th Committee: “It is the most political and least legitimate committee in American history.”

 

This was the GOP’s strategy from day one – to delegitimize the January 6th Committee. It was never about this country’s national security nor election integrity; it was about politics, politics, politics. Republican leaders knew full well how damning the Committee’s findings would be, so they immediately went on the defensive; refused to participate in the investigation; and would then label it as a partisan hit-job by the Democrats.

 

There was a bicameral commission proposed initially, but it ultimately failed due to Republicans filibustering in the Senate. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi then appointed a select committee as a Plan B.

 

So, it’s pretty rich McCarthy claims the January 6th Committee is the most political and least legitimate in American history. Democratic leaders reached across the aisle to make the committee appear more legitimate and less political, but McCarthy and other Republicans refused. If McCarthy and his ilk want to label the Committee as political and illegitimate, that’s fine, but they’re the reason for that. Also, whether he wants to believe it or not, the Committee is technically bipartisan, as Republicans Liz Cheney, Adam Kinzinger, and Denver Riggleman are all part of it. This tactic shouldn’t surprise me, but it is still flustering: Democratic leaders attempt to solve a problem; Republican leaders refuse; and Republican leaders then blame Democratic leaders for not solving the problem.

 

2) Faux News: Fox was the only ahem, “news,” network to not air the hearing. They instead allowed the likes of Tucker Carlson and Sean Hannity to fill the airwaves with debunked conspiracy theories.

 

I’m not defending Fox’s move, but I understand it. From election day to the January 6th attack on the U.S. Capitol and beyond, Fox was a key player in spreading disinformation that the 2020 election was stolen by Democrats from Donald Trump. They were essentially complicit in the January 6th attack and are guilty of crimes as a result, so of course they’re not going to air footage, providing further proof of their guilt. No, their strategy has long been to ignore, deflect, project, and repeat. It’s no wonder ardent viewers of Fox live in a completely different reality than everyone else. Fox News creates loons. Trademark it.

 

3) I Beg Your Pardon?: Pennsylvania Representative Scott Perry, among several other GOP members of Congress apparently asked then-President Donald Trump for pardons due to their involvement in trying to overturn the 2020 election.

 

Okay, so this news shared by Representative Cheney prompts a few of questions: 1) Who were all of these Congresspeople?, 2) Why would said Congresspeople feel the need to ask for pardons if they knew they hadn’t acted illegally?, and 3) Could any of these Congresspeople face criminal prosecution as a result?

 

Speaking of which, approximately 820 people affiliated with the January 6th attacks have either already been found guilty in a court of law or their trials are currently pending. To think they all felt Trump would pardon them. Ah, good times.

 

4) Debunking the Bunk: Co-Chair Cheney really attacked her opening statement like a prosecutor. She thoroughly outlined the Committee’s plan and provided several snippets of evidence along the way. This included testimony from: Attorney General William Barr, Trump spokesperson Jason Miller, Trump’s daughter Ivanka, his top data aide Matt Oczkowski, among others all saying the same thing: “There was zero evidence to suggest that the election was stolen, and we informed Trump of this.”

 

The written and video evidence also seemed to suggest there was nothing “riot”-like about the attacks. It was organized and planned.

 

The videos also showcased there was nothing “touristy” about the event. I’ll never forget one Trumper in the Committee’s video, who said he was prepared to do whatever it took to get the job done – that he’d lay down his life if need be, that’s what he was there for. If anyone can watch that and, with a straight face, claim the people were there as nothing more than tourists, they need to get placed in a loony bin stat.

 

Also, Trumper after Trumper looked right into the camera and said they were there because Trump directed them. Trump’s own tweets were expressed over a megaphone, demanding action. Trump can believe whatever he wants; his followers were there for one reason – they felt he told them to be there and to take action against the Capitol, our Congress, and the Constitution. And right after Trump sent these directives, he hid in his little bunker, like always.

 

5) Emotion Over Devotion to Commotion: After watching the video shared by documentarian Nick Quested and listening to the testimony provided by Capitol police officer Caroline Edwards, I’m not sure how anyone with a conscience in tact could feel anything but teary-eyed and nauseated. It was gripping, anger- and tear-inducing, and can never be forgotten. Those void of a conscience may disagree, but they were likely watching Fox Noise anyway.

 

6) Hangman: I think the one line which hit me harder than any other was when Ms. Cheney said, “Aware of the rioters’ chants to ‘hang Mike Pence’ [his vice-president], the president responded with this sentiment: ‘Maybe our supporters have the right idea.’ Mike Pence ‘deserves it.’”

 

No matter how desensitized I’ve become to Donald Trump’s stupefying and vile utterances, this statement still shocked me. Think about it: the then-President of the Untied States essentially said he felt his very own Vice President should be hanged for not illegally overturning a democratically-held election.

 

After the election, but prior to the attack on the Capitol, I told a friend of mine that I truly felt, if Donald Trump had been reelected, any semblance of democracy in this country would vanish. He contended I may have been blowing things out of proportion. Then the January 6th attacks took place, and with each passing day, my dire prediction appears progressively more accurate. How far was Donald Trump willing to go to overturn an election? The guy said his own Vice President deserved to be f*cking hanged for not illegally doing so.

 

That’s it for today’s episode. Until next time, you can check me out on Podbean, Twitter, Amazon, Facebook, and Blogger. This has been I Feel Snitty, with Craig Rozniecki. Take care.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"