Skip to main content

Transcript for Podcast: "I Feel Snitty," Episode 196: "Stick to the Sports" is now available!

Podcast: I Feel Snitty

Episode 196: Stick to the Sports

Premiere Date: 6/14/2022

Length: 5:07 (869 words)

Link: https://ifeelsnitty.podbean.com/e/stick-to-the-sports/

Transcript: 

Welcome to I Feel Snitty, episode 196, entitled, “Stick to the Sports.” I’m your host, Craig Rozniecki.

 

While I typically stand up for celebrities’ rights to speak freely without the fear of repercussion, there are occasions when the dumb-jock stereotype rings true and it’d probably be best for said athletes to just stick to the sports. The two latest cases? Washington Commanders defensive coordinator Jack Del Rio and Tampa Bay Devil Rays pitcher Jason Adam.

 

Let’s start with Del Rio, who recently compared the January 6th Capitol attack to the 2020 Black Lives Matter protests, saying, “People’s livelihoods are being destroyed, businesses are being burned down – no problem. And then we have a dust-up at the Capitol, nothing burned down – and we’re gonna make a major deal?” Del Rio has been fined $100,000 by the team due to his remarks, but let’s focus on the heart of the matter. The guy will still be reeling in $3.4 million this year, so $100,000 to him would be like $1,500 to most people.

 

First off, let’s acknowledge the pasty-ass elephant in the room – Jack Del Rio is white. The guy is insinuating that the mostly peaceful protests aimed at ending police brutality against black men and women have been more destructive than a domestic terrorist attack on the U.S. Capitol, in an effort to overturn a democratically-held presidential election and destroy the American republic as a result was. Yeah, okay, that sounds about white…

 

Next we have Tampa Bay Devil Rays pitcher and man likely to one day be the focal point of a satirical gay musical, “Chasing Adam,” – Jason Adam. To celebrate Pride Month, the Devil Rays took part in Pride Night a couple of weeks ago. Well, most of the Devil Rays took part in it, by wearing rainbow-colored logos on their uniforms. Among those who didn’t, however, was Mr. Chasing Adam himself, who explained his reason why as follows:

 

“A lot of it comes down to faith, to like a faith-based decision. So it’s a hard decision. Because ultimately we all said what we want is them to know that all are welcome and loved here. But when we put it on our bodies, I think a lot of guys decided that it’s just a lifestyle that maybe – not that they look down on anybody or think differently – it’s just that maybe we don’t want to encourage it if we believe in Jesus, who’s encouraged us to live a lifestyle that would abstain from that behavior, just like (Jesus) encourages me as a heterosexual male to abstain from sex outside of the confines of marriage. It’s no different. It’s not judgmental. It’s not looking down. It’s just what we believe the lifestyle he's encouraged us to live, for our good, not to withhold. But again, we love these men and women, we care about them, and we want them to feel safe and welcome here.”

 

As The Jesus once said in the book of Two Corinthians, “What a load of horseshit.” Okay, no, he didn’t say that, but he talked as much about horseshit in the Bible as he did the LGBT community.

 

I think Chasing Adam’s rationale irks me more than loud-and-proud homophobes. At least, with the latter group, they’re not pussyfooting around the issue. They’re bigots and that’s that. We all know where they stand. With the Chasing Adams of the world, they’re as bigoted, if not more so, than the loud-and-proud homophobes, yet they try to play it off as something else. They use organized religion as a crutch to skirt the issue.

 

First off, the term “lifestyle” implies there’s a choice to be had. So, whenever a person makes such a claim, my immediate question is, “…and when was it you decided to become a straight person? To be attracted to the opposite sex?” That typically gives them pause, before they come back with some bullshit, like, “When God entered my life” or “Whenever God decided.” Bullshit. You didn’t decide to become a heterosexual, just like a gay dude didn’t magically wake up one Tuesday and exclaim to the world, “I’m going to like penis!” Attraction doesn’t work like that. Orientation isn’t a choice of lifestyle; it’s part of who you are.

 

Then Chasing Adam has the figurative balls to suggest that, while he’s not going to showcase symbolic support for the LGBT community, he is going to contend he’s not judging nor looking down upon them – all the while implying that homosexuals are going against God’s wishes and will be damned for all eternity due to their dastardly deeds.

 

This reminds me of when self-described Christians say about the LGBT community, “Love the sinner; hate the sin.” So, you hate that they’re gay, which is a key component to who they are, yet you love them? Yeah, how does that work? “I hate you, but I love you. I don’t want to show you an iota of support, but I welcome you.”

 

Yup, The Jesus was right: “What a load of horseshit.” Amen.

 

That’s it for today’s episode. Until next time, you can find me on Podbean, Twitter, Amazon, Facebook, and Blogger. This has been I Feel Snitty, with Craig Rozniecki. Take care.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"