Skip to main content

Disowning Children Based on Sexual Orientation

So, I talked to an old buddy of mine on the phone last week. He came out of the closet to his closest friends about 10 years ago and we were all fine with it. None of us were surprised. In fact, when he came out to me, I didn't even realize at first he had just come out, because rightly or wrongly, I kind of assumed it.

When he came out to his parents, unfortunately, they weren't as accepting. His mother seemed disappointed, but could live with it. His father was a different beast entirely and wanted nothing to do with him. So, my friend, I'll call him Bill, was disowned by his own parents.

Ever since that point, he's battled problems with alcohol and drugs, has moved around a bunch and has come back home wanting his parents' acceptance. They'd take him back for a short while, thinking they could "cure" him of this obvious illness and when that didn't happen, they'd kick him out again.

Just last week, Bill told me he had recently spoken to his father and his dad asked Bill, "So, are you still living 'the lifestyle'?"

Bill asked, "What lifestyle is that? Drinking or being gay?"

His father replied, "Being gay."

Bill said, "I will always be gay."

His dad then stated, "Well, as long as you're gay, you're never to step inside this household again" and he then hung up.

Bill then went into treatment for his addiction problems. He was just released today and though it is going to be a tough road ahead, he seems to think things are moving forward again and I sincerely hope they are.

But, back to the broader topic at hand, it boggles my mind how a parent(s) could disown their very own child due to his or her sexual orientation. Now, they don't have to agree with it. They don't have to become full supporters of gay marriage rights. That's their right. But, to disown their own child? I cannot not for the life of me understand that. No matter who we're talking about, whether it be a best friend, a sister, a pastor or a mere acquaintance, we're never going to fully agree with another's beliefs and/or decisions. Heck, when I look back on my own life, there were some decisions I wish I would have made differently. So, whether one's child becomes a janitor, doesn't get married, becomes Hindu or is gay, why should that detract from the love a parent or parents should feel for their own child? I wouldn't care if my kid (if I had one) was: Gay, straight, bisexual, transgender, a cross-dresser, had a sex change, was a Democrat, Republican, Independent, Libertarian, Christian, Muslim, Jewish, Hindu, Buddhist, Taoist, Atheist, Agnostic, male, female, hermaphroditic, rich, middle class, poor, thin, average size, obese, etc., I'd still love them. I wouldn't agree with everything they believed and wouldn't agree with all the decisions they made, but I'd still love them. I only wish that Bill's father and other parents like him were the same way.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"