Skip to main content

Democrats believe in democracy while Republicans believe in oligarchy

With each and every election cycle, I begin to increasingly wonder if the Republican Party will change its name to the Oligarch Party. For as pro-freedom and liberty as their rhetoric typically is, it amazes me how anti-democratic the Republican Party has become. Allow me to compare the two parties on this front:

Democratic Party
- Wants to overturn Citizen's United so that corporations are limited in their campaign donations

- Doesn't believe corporations are people

- Wants to expand voting efforts to maximize voting on election day

- Believes a strong economy is build from the base up

- Doesn't believe in repressing certain demographics of voters



Republican Party
- Wants to maintain the Citizen's United ruling so corporations aren't limited in their campaign donations like people are

- Believes corporations are people

- Wants to restrict voting on election day

- Believes in trickle-down economics

- Believes in repressing certain demographics of voters


In other words, while Democrats tend to want to provide a larger range of people with greater opportunities, both professionally and as voters, and to not be dominated by the top 1% of money earners, Republicans tend to want to provide a smaller range of people with greater opportunities, both professionally and as voters, and to be dominated by the top 1% of money earners. If things continue to trend as they have been, before too long, we'll have the Democratic Party and the Oligarch Party, with the latter's logo going from an elephant to a man on a yacht filled with money.

http://zfacts.com/p/318.html

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun...

Face guarding is legal in college football and the NFL

I just wanted to remind fans and announcers especially, that face guarding is legal in both college football and the NFL. It all comes down to contact. So long as a defender doesn't make contact with an intended receiver, he doesn't have to turn around to play the ball. I can't tell you how many times every week I hear announcers talk about face guarding being a penalty. It's not. I even heard one announcer yesterday state, "If the defender doesn't turn around and play the ball, the ref will call pass interference every time." That's simply not true. Courtesy of referee Bill LeMonnier, he says this with regard to the rule at the college level (answered on 8/12/13): "NCAA rules on pass interference require the face guarding to have contact to be a foul. No contact, no foul by NCAA rules." In the NFL rule book, this is written:  "Actions that constitute defensive pass interference include but are not limited to: (a) Contact by a ...