Skip to main content

What I learned in Week 9 of the NFL season

In Week 9 of the NFL season, I learned that...

- ...New Orleans can win as many road games every year as there are February 14ths.

- ...Jim Harbaugh is wondering if the Kansas City Chiefs would be willing to trade Alex Smith for Colin Kaepernick - that or if he should go back to college.

- ...Michael Vick is secretly wishing he was still hurt so he wouldn't be forced to start for the New York Jets ever again.

- ...Mark Sanchez's biggest fear is to have a butt-fumble-part-deux while starting in Philadelphia (that or his first penis fumble).

- ..., even after passing for 438 yards and seeing his defense (and special teams) give up 43 points on Sunday, Denver Broncos quarterback Peyton Manning decided to take the blame, saying, "If I had just yelled 'Omaha' a few more times, maybe we could have scored more points than we did."

- ..., slipping to 6-3 following two consecutive losses, Dallas Cowboys players and management got in touch with their inner-Dennis Green and said, "We've been .500 for how many years now? We are who they thought we were!"

- ...Cam Newton is starting to worry that the little boy starring across from him in a commercial will soon take his starting job.

- ...the San Diego Chargers will be scheduled to have a series of meetings this week, all called, "WTF Was That?"

- ..., after their 8th consecutive loss, Oakland Raiders players and coaches all said something close to, "We put in a lot of hard work and effort week in and week out to find ways to lose at the end of games."

- ...Ben Roethlisberger hasn't removed his Superman costume for the past couple of weeks.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"