Skip to main content

Bill O'Reilly Loses Cool While Miniature Golfing

During Fox News' annual miniature golf outing, The O'Reilly Factor host Bill O'Reilly apparently lost his cool on the 18th green, as his ball bounced against an alligator's mouth and into the water for a one-stroke penalty, which eliminated him from winning the coveted FNMG Trophy (Fox News Mini Golf - called F'in MG by its competitors).

When asked to rehash the events, eventual winner of the competition, Chris Wallace, said, "I'm not sure what got into him. As soon as his ball bounced against that alligator's mouth and into the water, he must have known it was over, and started yelling some obscenities that I had never even heard before. He then tried breaking his club over his knee, wound up hurting his back in the process, but instead of stopping there and taking it easy, he decided to throw the club as far as he could. It wound up going a couple feet and hitting Shepard Smith in the back of the head as he was trying to take a sip of his Snapple. Then Bill went up to Shepard, and instead of apologizing, demanded to read the inside of the Snapple cap, before spiking it to the ground like a football and yelling, 'Snapple (bleeping) sucks!' I've known Bill for a long time, and even though I've known him to get a little excited here and there, well, on a nightly basis - especially around female subordinates, I've never seen him get like that."

In response to Wallace's statement, O'Reilly countered with, "That's f**king bullsh*t! Do I look like I lose my cool at all? Huh? Huh? Do I? What are you looking at? You think you're tough? Do you want to go? Do you want a piece of this? I asked you a simple question! Does it look like I ever get f**king pissed off? Do I ever f**king yell? Do I ever f**king swear? Two words - f**k no!"

Due to O'Reilly's anger outburst, the Fox News crew has now been barred from miniature golf courses across the country, so the network will start a new annual tradition later this year - Fact-checking.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"