Skip to main content

Mitch McConnell has trouble with chronology

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell has frequently admitted he's not a scientist, but due to his recent comments, Democratic National Committee Communications Director Mo Elleithee added, "...Now we know he's not a mathematician or an economist either."

This is because a day after Republicans took control of Congress and long after the economy began to show signs of improvement following the recession, McConnell made the following statement:

"After so many years of sluggish growth, we're finally starting to see some economic data that can provide a glimmer of hope; the uptick appears to coincide with the biggest political change of the Obama Administration's long tenure in Washington: the expectation of a new Republican Congress."

Yeah, that's it... Unemployment is at 5.8 percent, far lower than where it had been previously, and yes, the decrease occurred prior to Republicans taking control Congress. The gross domestic product (GDP) also increased by 5% in the third quarter of 2014, which is quite an improvement, and once again, occurred prior to Republicans taking over Congress.

So, according to Mitch (and probably others like him), through a gradual nationwide psychic reading, we were able to improve the economy for the simple fact that we knew, come 2015 - 6 years after President Obama was sworn into office - Republicans would take control of Congress. It's as if he's seriously thinking to himself, "We haven't been in control of Congress until now, but the steadily improving economy? We built that!"

Based on that logic, it appears as if Mitch McConnell has either lost his marbles (figuratively speaking, of course) or he's mentally-challenged when it comes to chronology. Based on his rationale, or lack there of, expect the Senate Majority Leader to say the following things at some point in the future:

- "How about all of these people getting healthcare? Think it could have anything to do with the expectation of a new Republican Congress? I certainly think so."

- "It looks like pro-gay marriage laws are becoming more widespread across this country. Why is this do you think? I think it comes down to one thing and one thing only - the expectation of a new Republican Congress!"

- "So, some good things have happened these past six years when we weren't in power and even though we made it our #1 goal to make Obama a one-term president, I think we should receive all the credit for these good things now that we are finally in power, you know?"

No, not at all... As White House senior adviser Dan Pfeiffer said about the matter, quoting former Chicago Bulls player Stacey King, "I'll always remember this as the night that Michael Jordan and I combined for 70 points."

For the record, Jordan scored 69 of those 70 points.

http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2015/01/07/3609140/mcconnell-gdp-republicans/

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/01/07/mitch-mcconnell-economy-republicans_n_6429912.html

http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/228791-dems-mock-mcconnell-for-linking-gop-to-positive-economy

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"