Skip to main content

The double-standard of "dad bods"

I personally don't care whether a majority of women find "dad bods" sexy or not, but I do care about the apparent societal double-standard regarding the matter.

The term "dad bods" has been trending the past couple of weeks or so. According to my translation, it can be defined as "a man who isn't obese, but doesn't take care of himself a great deal either. He may do five sit-ups daily, lift 1-lb. dumbbells (remote controls) off and on for weeks at a time, and knows when to cut back from drinking ten beers to five beers in a sitting, but besides that, he's pretty much a lazy bum, and his beer-belly shows it."

Ever since this started trending, guys have been celebrating, saying, "This is great news for us! We can be slobs and women will find us attractive for it!" Honestly, though, I'm not going to place much faith in the trend until I read such numbers from a reputable polling firm. Whether the trend has any validity or not, however, when has there been such a wave for "mom bods"? Women, throughout history, have been constantly sexualized by the media. Most female models portrayed through the media have unattainable (and unhealthy) figures for 95% of the population. A lot of women, especially young adult women it seems, often times look up to such models for influence on how to look and what to wear, and find themselves feeling unattractive due to this ridiculous comparison and unrealistic aspiration. Granted, psychological studies have showcased that physical attractiveness tends to be higher on the priority ladder for men than for women, but in any case, if men want their average-slightly-overweight bodies to be accepted and found to be sexy by women, it's only fair for them to treat women with average-slightly-overweight bodies in the same manner. Heck, if either gender should be on the receiving end of this new wave, it's women, for it's women whom have to take care of a child inside of them for 9 months at a time and be forced to try and work off this added weight following the child's birth. Men will never win that argument with women.

Man: "Well, you didn't cook as much during these past several months, so I had to shove fast food down my throat constantly and your moodiness caused me to want to drink a lot more beer than usual with the guys. What's your excuse?"

Woman: "I had to take care of a baby inside of me!"

Like I said, men will NEVER win that argument.

There's nothing wrong with men being attracted to fit women and there's nothing wrong with women being attracted to men with "dad bods," but let's cut it out with the double-standards. Men, just because a woman might be attracted to a guy with a beer-gut doesn't give you an excuse to be lazy and doesn't give you an excuse to find her unattractive because she has a similar stomach as yours. If anyone should be accepted and seen as attractive for having a little extra weight, it's women, for they have to go through a life-altering process none of us guys will ever have to worry about - giving birth to a child.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"