Skip to main content

CNN comes out with the most pointless poll of the week!

According to the latest CNN/ORC poll, 45% of the public approves of the job President Obama is doing, while 52% disapprove (net -7%). Those numbers are closely in line with most polls, where the president averages an approval rating of about 45% and a disapproval rating of approximately 50% (net -5%). That isn't the pointless part of the poll, however.

Here was a CNN headline from today: "Bush now more popular than Obama."

That's right; CNN decided to compare the approval ratings of the current president, who's been in office for 6.5 years, to the president before him, who hasn't been in office for the past 6.5 years.

Here's how CNN's Jennifer Agiesta decided to word things:

"...For the first time in a decade, more Americans say they like him (Bush) than dislike him.

According to the poll, 52% of adults had a favorable impression of George W. Bush, 43% unfavorable (net +9%). When Bush left office in 2009, only about a third of Americans said they had a positive opinion of him..."

Newsflash - presidents historically get more popular after they step out of office and it's incredibly stupid to compare a former president's current approval rating with the current president's. If CNN feels the need to make such a comparison, they can look at President Bush's numbers 6.5 years into his tenure and see how they match up with President Obama's. In fact, I'll do that for them. At this point in Bush's presidency, his approval rating was 35% and disapproval was at 62% (net -27%), which is 20-22% worse than President Obama. So, nice try, CNN.

Another facepalm-worthy moment in the poll was the public's response when asked the question, "Whose policies are more to blame for the current problems the U.S. faces in Iraq?" The two were nearly dead even, as 43% responded with Bush and 44% responded with Obama.

The public apparently has a very short-term memory. President Bush and his administration started the mess in Iraq by lying us into war in the first place. How can just as many people (slightly more, in fact) blame President Obama for trying to clean up the mess President Bush created? Do they also blame the current president for the Great Recession when he inherited it upon stepping into office in 2009? It reminds me of that old story I'm about to make up where a class bully breaks a kid's lunchbox, someone else tries to fix the lunchbox, isn't able to fully do so, so the one whom got bullied fully blames him for breaking the lunchbox in the first place. No, it doesn't make a bit of sense and neither does this poll result.

Congratulations, CNN! You've just released the most pointless poll of the week! Next week, I'll be expecting to see you release a poll which compares fictional presidents' approval ratings with the current president's. Good luck! Now get to work!

http://www.cnn.com/2015/06/03/politics/george-w-bush-favorability-ratings/

http://www.cnn.com/2015/06/03/politics/obama-approval-rating-cnn-poll/

http://www.pollingreport.com/BushJob1.htm

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"