Skip to main content

Critics getting personal vs. taking criticism personally

I just read an article entitled, "If You Don't Like Criticism, Don't Put Your Stuff Online" by Jody Thompson, and felt the need to respond. No, I'm not really going to go the ironic route and criticize her column about being prepared to take criticism when posting stuff online, but felt the need to elaborate a bit on what she wrote.

First off, nobody likes criticism. When asking a group of people what they enjoy (more than anything), you're never going to hear these people say this:

Chuck Denardo: "I enjoy rafting in baby-pools."

Lucy Pickens: "I like disco dancing on the interstate by myself."

Frank Buckets: "Every now and again, I can't help but like to skinny-dip in puddles after a big storm."

Sophia Ruiz: "There's nothing I like more than being criticized."

Sorry, not going to happen...

Granted, criticism kind of comes with the territory of, well, being alive. If one is working, one leaves themselves vulnerable to criticism. If one is married or has kids, again, they're left vulnerable to criticism. If one is in school or is a child at home, again, criticism is going to be all but inevitable at some point. This is also the case when sharing "stuff," as Jody Thompson termed it, on the Internet. How one handles criticism can say a lot about a person, especially if they struggled with it early but evolved over time. However, while I agreed with most of what Ms. Thompson wrote in her article, I think she forgot to touch on one important thing. As a critic herself, she said that she was always fair and respectful with her reviews and analysis, that she hopes all professional critics are this way, and those on the receiving end of such reviews shouldn't take things personally.

Again, I'd say I agree with most of what she wrote, but I also think it's pretty naive to believe all professional reviewers are fair and respectful, and that none of them get a bit too personal at times. There's a distinct difference between a person taking criticism too personally and a critic getting too personal. Now, granted, artists of all stripes tend to be their own worst critics. Being a writer myself, I know that as well as anyone. We also tend to be rather sensitive about our work, but our skin thickens over time (no, not literally). If we read an awful review of our work, which simply criticizes the book's plot, an album's inconsistency, or a film's direction, we may take that personally at first. We'll think to ourselves, "I put my whole mind, heart, and soul into that. That was my life. If he/she loathes this book/album/film, he/she loathes me as well!" Over time, we learn to divide the professional criticism from the personal criticism, but it can be difficult at times.

Artists perhaps should grow thicker skin and not be so sensitive to criticism, but being a writer for one, criticism often times feels different to me than it would for a lawyer or someone of most other professions. If a lawyer gets criticized for losing a case, that criticism is simply professional, When it comes to a writer (whether it be of books, music, or films), he or she tends to expose bits and pieces of themselves in their work, so when they're on the receiving end of criticism, those lines between professional and personal criticism can often become blurred in their mind. Regardless if the criticism was simply professional, however, there are some critics that do get personal. There's a drastic difference between a film critic saying, "Michael Moore's movie is awful," and saying, "Michael Moore's movie showcases just how big of a scum he really is!" With the former, details will be needed to elaborate on why the reviewer feels this way, but to this point, it's still a professional criticism. With the latter scenario, however, it's very much a personal criticism, and in my opinion, the critic is acting very unprofessionally and may want to seek another line of work. Yes, oddly enough, if critics post their "stuff" online, they too leave themselves vulnerable to receiving criticism. So I guess critics too, like Jody Thompson, should pay close attention to the title of her article, "If You Don't Like Criticism, Don't Put Your Stuff Online."

http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/jody-thompson/if-you-dont-like-criticism-dont-put-stuff-online_b_7547738.html

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun...

Face guarding is legal in college football and the NFL

I just wanted to remind fans and announcers especially, that face guarding is legal in both college football and the NFL. It all comes down to contact. So long as a defender doesn't make contact with an intended receiver, he doesn't have to turn around to play the ball. I can't tell you how many times every week I hear announcers talk about face guarding being a penalty. It's not. I even heard one announcer yesterday state, "If the defender doesn't turn around and play the ball, the ref will call pass interference every time." That's simply not true. Courtesy of referee Bill LeMonnier, he says this with regard to the rule at the college level (answered on 8/12/13): "NCAA rules on pass interference require the face guarding to have contact to be a foul. No contact, no foul by NCAA rules." In the NFL rule book, this is written:  "Actions that constitute defensive pass interference include but are not limited to: (a) Contact by a ...