Skip to main content

With allies like Trump, who needs adversaries?

The saying goes, "With friends likes these, who needs enemies?" When it comes to Donald Trump, the phrase could read, "With allies like him, who needs adversaries?" President Trump has been notorious for treating our allies like adversaries and our adversaries like allies. As a recent Pew Research Poll shows, our allies are noticing. Let's compare those numbers to how the world, our allies in particular, viewed us at the end of Obama's presidency:

Confidence
in Obama: 64% yes, 23% no (net +41%)
in Trump: 27% yes, 70% no (net -43%)
Difference: Obama +84%/Trump -84%

Views of U.S.
Obama: 64% favorable, 26% unfavorable (net +38%)
Trump: 50% favorable, 43% unfavorable (net +7%)
Difference: Obama +31%/Trump -31%

Allies' Approval
Australia: Obama 84%, Trump 54% (Obama +30%)
Canada: Obama 83%, Trump 39% (Obama +44%)
France: Obama 84%, Trump 38% (Obama +46%)
Germany: Obama 86%, Trump 30% (Obama +56%)
Greece: Obama 41%, Trump 36% (Obama +5%)
Italy: Obama 68%, Trump 52% (Obama +16%)
Japan: Obama 78%, Trump 67% (Obama +11%)
Mexico: Obama 49%, Trump 32% (Obama +17%)
Netherlands: Obama 92%, Trump 34% (Obama +58%)
Philippines: Obama 94%, Trump 83% (Obama +11%)
South Korea: Obama 88%, Trump 80% (Obama +8%)
Spain: Obama 75%, Trump 42% (Obama +33%)
United Kingdom: Obama 79%, Trump 50% (Obama +29%)\
Averages: Obama 77%, Trump 49% (Obama +28%)

So there you have it. Internationally, the view of the U.S. has dropped 31 points between Obama and Trump's presidencies. Not only that, there's an astronomical 84-point gap between these two leaders as far as international confidence in them goes. Lastly, amongst thirteen of our biggest allies, approval has dropped 28 points from our last president to our current one. It looks like, when Donald Trump said he intended to "make America great again," he really meant he intended to make America hated again.

http://www.pewglobal.org/2018/10/01/trumps-international-ratings-remain-low-especially-among-key-allies/

http://www.pewglobal.org/2017/06/26/u-s-image-suffers-as-publics-around-world-question-trumps-leadership/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"