Skip to main content

There really is no valid reason to vote for Donald Trump.

It's being reported Donald Trump paid just $750 in federal income taxes in 2016 and 2017 and paid no such taxes in 10 of the last 15 years, due to losing a whole hell of a lot more money than he made. Based on this report, it's being surmised Trump is $1.1 billion in debt.

So, let's go over the reasons why people say they voted/will be voting for Trump:
 
1) "He's a billionaire!"
Sure, billions in debt. I'm being told that's not the same thing...
 
2) "He tells it like it is!"
His documented 20,000+ lies since entering the Oval Office would suggest otherwise. Side-note: "Telling it the way you want to believe" is not "telling it like it is." Just because I so want to believe 2+2=146, and someone confirms this belief, does not make it so. 
 
3) "He's pro-life!"
When a "man" ignores a pandemic responsible for over 200,000 deaths; attempts to strip the healthcare of millions; actively tries to destroy the environment; and has allegedly paid women for abortions, he can only be accurately labeled as "pro-life" on opposite day.
 
4) "He's patriotic!"
Just because he fondles the flag to the point of it going to court for a restraining order against him, that doesn't make him patriotic. He dodged the draft multiple times; has called veterans "suckers" and "losers;" doesn't seem to know the words to the anthem or pledge; has embraced dictatorial adversaries; given allies the cold shoulder; and seemed to suggest our men and women overseas shouldn't be allowed to vote because mail-in voting - which has been around since the Civil War for the very same reason - is a scam.
 
5) "He's a Christian!"
He's called Christians "lunatics;" doesn't know how to hold a Bible right side up; can't stop talking about Two Corinthians; and seems to make it his daily goal to break every single one of the Ten Commandments. He's about as "Christian" as a butterfly named Sparkles is a T-Rex.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun
2 comments
Read more

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i
Post a Comment
Read more

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"
Post a Comment
Read more