Skip to main content

Herman Cain's New Ad and The Colbert Report's Spoof Of It

So, have you seen the latest Herman Cain ad? Whether you have or haven't, I recommend you view this video clip before reading further. It includes the actual Cain ad along with a spoof by Stephen Colbert and company on his program: http://www.colbertnation.com/the-colbert-report-videos/400682/october-25-2011/herman-cain-s-campaign-ad

Assuming you've watched the clip, is it just me or did the ad appear like a big joke? Like what Saturday Night Live or one of the late-night comedy shows would create? When I first saw this ad, via The Colbert Report, I thought the ad had to be a phony, but upon hearing news commentary and one of the creators of the ad validating the ad, I was at a loss. Honestly, Colbert didn't even have to spoof the ad in order for it to be hilarious upon viewing it.

Now there's all this analysis on the ad and what Cain's message and intent were with it. Yeah, best of luck with that. I'm not thinking this ad is anything Socrates or Plato would be proud of or anything. If 9-9-9 is any indication, the man is about as deep as an empty kiddie pool.

What I've found amusing, in the aftermath of this ad are Republican reactions to it and the coverage it's received. I heard one person say that if the Colbert spoof had been about Obama, liberals would have called it racist. Eh, no. There's a big difference between poking fun at a presidential candidate due to a strange ad and tying him/her to terrorists, attempting to instill fear in people due to his name and through this and other words/actions, trying to make the person appear foreign (with race being a factor in this). I also read several people say something along the lines of, "Cain succeeded in this ad. Commentators who are bashing this ad are giving publicity to it and the Cain campaign, benefiting the candidate." Okay, I can see their point, but only to a certain extent. While it's true that Cain has garnered a great deal of publicity due to this ad, I'm not a believer in the phrase, "Any publicity is good publicity." Sarah Palin's atrocious interview with Katie Couric preceding the 2008 election was publicity, but what resulted from it? Women's and independents' approval ratings of she and the McCain campaign decreasing. So, while Cain may receive a good amount of publicity for this ad, it's going to be received as a joke by the majority of people and this includes independents. A majority of Republicans may see it in a different light, but I can all but guarantee that's not going to be the case among Democrats, moderate to liberal Independents, the undecideds and even moderate to liberal Republicans. It's becoming more and more difficult to take Herman Cain seriously. Just like the vibe of the ad, his entire campaign is appearing to be a bigger and bigger joke to me. The really funny part is the fact he's leading all other Republican candidates in the recent polls. We'll see if that alters following this ad, his continued gaffes and future debates. I still have an extremely difficult time seeing anyone other than Mitt Romney winning the Republican nomination, but it seems as if the GOP is doing everything in their power to prevent that from occurring. He has the best shot of all GOP candidates to defeat President Obama in next year's election, so if he's not the nominee, good luck GOP!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"