Skip to main content

Republicans are always opponents of tax increases, unless it deals with Herman Cain's 9-9-9 plan, which would increase taxes for 83.8% of the population...

Yeah, that's right. The arguable front-runner to become the Republican nominee for the 2012 presidential election's tax plan would increase taxes for 83.8% of this country. Republicans recently voted down the American Jobs Act, which would have resulted in a raise of taxes for the top 1-2%, meaning that 98-99% of the country would be unaffected. In Cain's plan, those making anywhere from under $10,000 to $200,000 would see a mean tax hike of $3,381.75, a 950% spike for those making between $10,000 and $20,000 a year. For those making between $200,000 and over $1,000,000? They'd see a mean tax cut of $175,297, including a $455,247 tax cut for those making over $1,000,000.

That's right, folks. The anti-tax party, also know as the Republican Party, is a strong opponent of a plan which would increase taxes on the 1-2% wealthiest in this country while leaving 98-99% unscathed, yet support a plan which would increase taxes on the bottom 84%, with the top 16% being the beneficiaries of the plan.

I've got to hand it to the GOP. They have quite the clever little scheme going on here. They've beaten into the heads of this nation that the Democratic Party are the tax-happy party. When Democrats proposed to increase taxes on the top 1-2%, then the GOP went on to say, "You see? We told you so! They're raising your taxes!" Eh, 1-2% of them. They forgot to mention that little detail. But, here they are, having the public believe the Democrats are tax-happy, while they're anti-tax and then supporting a bill which would results in tax increases for over 4/5 of the population and only benefiting those most well off.

As the studies' results (non-partisan ones at that) have just been released, I really can't wait for the news stations, newspapers, politicians and late night talk show hosts (Stewart and Colbert, in particular) beat this tax plan into the ground. Hopefully people will start listening to what the catchy 9-9-9 is about and how it will effect them, with over 4/5 of them having to pay more in taxes.

As can be deduced, the Republican Party is full of math scholars:

1) We hate taxes.

2) We will never vote for a tax increase.

3) Case and point... We will note vote for a bill which increases taxes on 1-2% of the country, while leaving 98-99% of it unscathed. The number left unscathed must be 100%!

4) We support a plan which increases taxes on 84% of the population, while benefiting the top 16%.

Yup... the GOP is all about mathematics and consistency.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/09/12/obama-jobs-bill-payments_n_958560.html

http://taxpolicycenter.org/numbers/displayatab.cfm?DocID=3221

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun...

Mentioned on Crooks and Liars and Hinterland Gazette!

Due to some tweets of mine, I got mentioned on the following two sites (all my tweets can be viewed here -  https://twitter.com/CraigRozniecki ): https://crooksandliars.com/2019/04/trump-gives-stupid-advice-george https://hinterlandgazette.com/2019/03/istandwithschiff-is-trending-after-donald-trump-led-gop-attack-on-adam-schiff-backfires-spectacularly.html

Face guarding is legal in college football and the NFL

I just wanted to remind fans and announcers especially, that face guarding is legal in both college football and the NFL. It all comes down to contact. So long as a defender doesn't make contact with an intended receiver, he doesn't have to turn around to play the ball. I can't tell you how many times every week I hear announcers talk about face guarding being a penalty. It's not. I even heard one announcer yesterday state, "If the defender doesn't turn around and play the ball, the ref will call pass interference every time." That's simply not true. Courtesy of referee Bill LeMonnier, he says this with regard to the rule at the college level (answered on 8/12/13): "NCAA rules on pass interference require the face guarding to have contact to be a foul. No contact, no foul by NCAA rules." In the NFL rule book, this is written:  "Actions that constitute defensive pass interference include but are not limited to: (a) Contact by a ...