Skip to main content

Is the SEC really head and shoulders above all other conferences in college football this year?

The short answer? No. Yes, that's contrary to popular opinion, but like all the other major conferences it seems, the SEC is down this year. Yes, the SEC is currently home of the top 3 teams in the country, in LSU, Alabama and Arkansas, but outside of those three teams, the SEC is fairly average this year. Georgia has bounced back nicely following their 0-2 start. South Carolina is currently 9-2, but not as good as their record indicates I don't believe. I don't believe Auburn is as good as their 7-4 showcases. Heck, if I want to go there (and I do), I honestly don't believe Arkansas is as good as their 10-1 record and #3 ranking would suggest. Florida is a disappointing 6-5 (3-5 in conference). Tennessee has had another disappointing season, at 5-6 (1-6 in conference). Kentucky's 4-7 (1-6 in SEC play), Ole Miss has collapsed under Houston Nutt this season, going 2-9 (0-7 in the SEC) and Mississippi State is a disappointing 5-6 as well (1-6 in conference play). Closing up, Vanderbilt is 5-6 (2-6 in conference). To sum up those numbers, the SEC is extremely top heavy this year.

I'll be the first to admit, at this point in the season, LSU is the top team in the country. Outside of Houston, they are the only unbeaten left in college football. They've defeated Oregon, West Virginia, Florida, Auburn and Alabama. They will face Arkansas on Friday and Georgia in the SEC title game. If they win those two games, there's no question they should go to the national title game. Heck, if Georgia beats them, it'd still be difficult to not invite the Tigers to the biggest game of the college football season.

Is Alabama the #2 team in the land? Maybe, but they haven't been quite as dominant as LSU and haven't faced as quality a schedule as the Tigers have. Alabama has defeated Penn State, Arkansas and Florida and still have to face in-state rival Auburn next Saturday.

I am not a believer that Arkansas is a top 3 team. They struggled against Troy earlier this season, beating the Trojans 38-28. They were demolished by Alabama 38-14. They should have lost to 6-5 Texas A&M, but came back against the Aggies to win 42-38. They struggled against woeful Mississippi, beating the Rebels 29-24. This was also the case against 5-6 Vanderbilt, as the Hogs beat the Commodores 31-28. The Razorbacks did beat Auburn and South Carolina fairly handily. Arkansas is a very solid team, but I honestly don't believe them to be top 3. If they defeat LSU this next week, I will definitely change my tune, but won't until that takes place.

How can we really compare the major conferences without head-to-head match-ups between the six automatic-qualifying conferences? To this point, the SEC has the top winning percentage of the six major conferences in such match-ups, as they're 6-2 in such games. They do play four more this coming week against the ACC, whom they're 0-1 against so far this season. Vanderbilt will take on Wake Forest. Florida will face Florida State. Georgia will play against Georgia Tech. Finally, South Carolina will square off against Clemson. I give the ACC an edge with Wake Forest and Florida State, the SEC an advantage with Georgia and give a push to the South Carolina-match-up.

What the SEC has going for them is the fact in their 6 wins against automatic-qualifying conferences, their opponents' record is a combined 42-21 (.667). Second place in this category is the Big XII with their opponents going a combined 33-32 (.507). The SEC has defeated: Connecticut (4-6), Cincinnati (7-3), Oregon (9-2), West Virginia (7-3), Penn State (9-2) and Texas A&M (6-5). Five of the six teams they've defeated will likely go to bowl games and the other could still possibly go bowling at the end of the year if they win their final two regular season games. That's very impressive and if we're just going on that, the SEC is tops in the land without question. However, they do have four such games this upcoming weekend and if my predictions are correct, they'll likely finish either 8-4 or 7-5 against automatic-qualifying conferences, which would either tie them with the Big XII (6-3) or place them slightly behind that conference in this category.

Where the SEC doesn't fare quite as well is the fact (this includes the four games this next weekend) the twelve teams in conference have played a total of 12 automatic-qualifying teams out of 48 possible non-conference games (25.0%), which is 5th amongst the six major conferences, only leading the Big Ten (11/48 = 22.9%). The SEC has faced as many Division I-AA teams (12/48 = 25.0%) as automatic-qualifying conference teams, the only conference that can say that. In comparison, the ACC has faced 18 automatic-qualifying conference teams in 48 non-conference games (37.5%). The Pac-12 and Big East aren't far behind at 36.1% and 35.0% and the Big XII finishing fourth in the category at 30.0%.

When the SEC has faced automatic-qualifying conference teams, they've fared very well, but the conference has played a weaker overall non-conference schedule than any other possibly outside the Big Ten. Is the SEC the top conference in all the country this year? That is very possible. I'd say they're, without question, one of the top two, but I also don't believe that even if the SEC is the top conference in the land, that the gap is as wide between they and #2 as most would like to believe. It'll be interesting to see how they fare this next weekend in their 4 games against the ACC.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"