Skip to main content

Tim Tebow-mania as the Broncos win again with him completing two of eight pass attempts...

Geez... For the second consecutive week and the third out of four starts, the Denver Broncos won with Tim Tebow at the helm, to help improve the Broncos to 4-5 on the year and just a game back of Oakland in the AFC West. Tebow for the game? He completed just two of eight pass attempts for 69 yards and a touchdown. He also rushed the ball 9 times for 43 yards. He was responsible for only 112 of Denver's 313 yards of offense. But, yes, the Broncos won.

I've honestly never seen such stats in a NFL game before. The Broncos rushed the ball 55 times and threw it only 8. 87.3% of their plays were rushes.

On the year, Tebow has completed 47 of 105 pass attempts (44.8%) for 605 yards. I honestly cannot believe such numbers for a NFL starting quarterback and that the team is actually winning.

It'd be ridiculous to give Tebow much credit for the win, however. Lance Ball carried the ball 30 times for 96 yards. Knowshon Moreno carried it 4 times for 52 yards. Eddie Royal added 3 rushes for 19 yards. Spencer Larsen rushed it 5 times for 17 yards and Willis McGahee carried the ball 4 times for 17 yards (along with Tebow's before-mentioned stats of 9 carries for 43 yards). Denver rushed the ball 55 times for 244 yards.

So, what now for the Broncos? They'll be sticking to the run so long as they keep on winning, but it may be difficult given the fact both Moreno and McGahee got hurt on Sunday, with Moreno being doubtful for Thursday night's game against the Jets.

Speaking of which, Tebow and company will face some much tougher defenses in the next four weeks, having to go up against the Jets at home this Thursday, travel to San Diego to face the Chargers the following week, go head-to-head with the Minnesota Vikings' 6th ranked run defense (30th in pass defense, however) on the road, before facing Brian Urlacher and the Chicago Bears. I'm guessing they'll lose at least 3 of those 4 games, with Minnesota being the question mark and that would send them to 5-8 on the year. They then play New England at home, Buffalo on the road close up with Kansas City at home. I have a hard time seeing them beat New England (5-9). Buffalo hasn't looked very good the past couple weeks, but a December 24th game in Buffalo may be difficult for most road teams, especially Tebow and the Broncos (5-10). Kansas City is an unknown. They started playing better before getting demolished by the then winless Dolphins a week ago and then losing to Denver this past weekend. At best, I'd say the Broncos finish 6-10 or 7-9. In this league, though, as some of yesterday's results illustrated (Seattle over Baltimore? Really?), who knows anymore?

As for Tebow, I'm still in no way convinced he will ever be a consistently effective NFL starter. Never before have I see a quarterback throw the ball 10 times a game and be successful. But like I said, who knows anymore?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"