Skip to main content

Louisiana Representative Bill Cassidy infers that the uninsured are stupid

Republican Louisiana Representative Bill Cassidy, who is running to be the party's Senate candidate for the coming elections, recently said the following in a speech given to the Louisiana Oil and Gas Association with regard to health insurance:

"[My plan] I think actually reflects the reality of who the uninsured are, relatively less sophisticated, less comfortable with forms, less educated. Those are the folks that - not all - there's a guy who goes to my church who's uninsured, who's middle-class but couldn't get it because he has Type 1 diabetes. So it's not all, but it is the folks who I think are going to have the hardest time reaching [...]"

Excuse me?!? I don't think so... What makes this quote even sadder is the fact that Mr. Cassidy is a physician. As sad as it is to say, there are many other people like the guy he knows at church whom don't have health insurance. I happen to be one of them. I happen to possess three college degrees, graduated with a 3.75 GPA (should have been higher), was given an IQ test by a teacher in college and told it tied the highest score the he had ever seen, won a spelling bee, several math awards, etc. What's my problem been? Health, unfortunately. From complications at birth (six weeks early and weighed in at less than 4 lbs.), to being diagnosed with epilepsy, to suffering a grand mal seizure and being told I had a brain tumor, to suffering a seizure in a college Spanish class and deciding to undergo surgery to remove the tumor that following summer, to scoliosis, to temporomandibular joint, to a bizarre two-year virus the doctors never truly concluded on - but informed me I may have a slight case of small-fiber sensory neuropathy and arteriovenous malformation around my spinal cord, to a gallstone and gall-bladder surgery etc., I was dropped from Anthem Blue Cross Blue Shield a couple of years ago due to being unable to pay my premium for one month (after having done so for I don't know how many years), and when I applied to other insurance companies, I was rejected due to pre-existing conditions. When I did have healthcare and was being bounced around like a pinball between Columbus and Cleveland, as doctors and specialists were attempting to uncover what my condition actually was for a couple of years, my premium doubled from $150 to $300. Unfortunately, even though most of the costs of plans under "Obamacare" are less than $300 per month, it's still too much for me to afford, so chances are, I'll go without healthcare for another year and have to pay the fine in 2015.

The level of education a person has under their belt isn't the main factor in whether or not he or she has health insurance, Mr. Cassidy. The biggest factor is the costs of insurance. As a physician and a "well-educated" person, I'd think you'd know that...

http://thinkprogress.org/health/2014/03/26/3419558/republican-louisiana-senate-candidate-the-uninsured-are-less-sophisticated-less-educated/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"