Skip to main content

The real GOP rebranding

Ever since they suffered significant defeats in the 2012 election, the Republican Party has talked about "rebranding" themselves. This has been anything but successful, as for every one pro-women's or pro-minorities' rights speech they give, it seems as if they give four or five in the opposite direction.

When I thought about the GOP and "rebranding" the other night, though, a thought occurred to me - the party has been quite successful with the concept of rebranding, just not when it comes to their party's image. No, the kind of rebranding I'm talking about is in reference to words. Let me run down a list of the words or concepts the GOP has seemed to successfully rebrand over the years (unfortunately):

Liberal
Actual definition: "Favorable to or in accord with concepts of maximum individual freedom possible, especially as guaranteed by law and secured by governmental protection of civil liberties," "favoring or permitting freedom of action, especially with respect to matters of personal believe or expression," "open-minded or tolerant," and/or "characterized by generosity."

GOP's rebranded definition: "Worthless moochers, takers, and socialists who just want to destroy freedom and punish success."


Socialism
Actual definition: "A theory or system of social organization that advocates the vesting of ownership and control of the means of production and distribution, of capital, land, etc., in the community as a whole."

GOP's rebranded definition: "What Democrats all are. It's the same thing as communism. These no good, stinkin' communist socialist Marxist progressive liberal Democrats are trying to destroy what our Founding Fathers had in mind with capitalism!"


Welfare
Actual definition: "Receiving financial aid from the government or from a private organization because of hardship and need."

GOP's rebranded definition: "Lazy, irresponsible, drug addicts, who don't want to work and just want to take our money, so they can continue being lazy, irresponsible drug addicts!"


Patriotism
Actual definition: "Devoted love, support, and defense of one's country; national loyalty."

GOP's rebranded definition: "Shouting to the the heavens about how much you love your country (while doing little to nothing to actually show that)."


Christian
Actual definition: "Of, pertaining to, believing in, or belonging to the religion based on the teachings of Jesus Christ."

GOP's rebranded definition: "Screaming with all your might how much you love Jesus; giving to the rich and taking from the poor; condemning gays and slutty baby-killers (pregnant mothers); you know, loving everyone like Jesus would."

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/liberal?s=t

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/socialism?s=t

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/welfare?s=t

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/patriotism?s=t

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/christian?s=t

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun...

Mentioned on Crooks and Liars and Hinterland Gazette!

Due to some tweets of mine, I got mentioned on the following two sites (all my tweets can be viewed here -  https://twitter.com/CraigRozniecki ): https://crooksandliars.com/2019/04/trump-gives-stupid-advice-george https://hinterlandgazette.com/2019/03/istandwithschiff-is-trending-after-donald-trump-led-gop-attack-on-adam-schiff-backfires-spectacularly.html

Face guarding is legal in college football and the NFL

I just wanted to remind fans and announcers especially, that face guarding is legal in both college football and the NFL. It all comes down to contact. So long as a defender doesn't make contact with an intended receiver, he doesn't have to turn around to play the ball. I can't tell you how many times every week I hear announcers talk about face guarding being a penalty. It's not. I even heard one announcer yesterday state, "If the defender doesn't turn around and play the ball, the ref will call pass interference every time." That's simply not true. Courtesy of referee Bill LeMonnier, he says this with regard to the rule at the college level (answered on 8/12/13): "NCAA rules on pass interference require the face guarding to have contact to be a foul. No contact, no foul by NCAA rules." In the NFL rule book, this is written:  "Actions that constitute defensive pass interference include but are not limited to: (a) Contact by a ...