Skip to main content

Newsflash: Obamacare didn't cost Alex Sink a House seat

Congressional Republicans and conservative media outlets didn't waste any time in declaring their special election victory on Tuesday night was the result of the public being angered over the Affordable Care Act (AKA Obamacare). Many such talking heads have gone on to say, "This just shows you how badly the GOP will steamroll Democrats in November due to this awful law."

I hate to disappoint these giddy conservatives, but the numbers don't back up their claims. Among Independent voters in the FL-13 election, 57% sided with Democratic candidate Alex Sink with regard to her position on the healthcare law (maintaining the law and fixing any problematic components, but not repealing it), while just 31% sided with Republican candidate David Jolly on the issue (full repeal of the law). In other words, even the unaffiliated voters down the middle strongly sided with the Democrat in this election regarding the Affordable Care Act.

Among all voters in this special election, 43% said they had "very major doubts" regarding Alex Sink's stance on Obamacare, while 35% said they had no doubts (net -8%). Meanwhile, 50% said they held "very major doubts" with regard to David Jolly's stance on the issue, and 26% said they had no doubts (net -24%).

In other words, "Obamacare" didn't hinder Alex Sink in this election. If anything, it helped her. So, I'm sorry to tell Congressional Republicans, conservative media outlets, and even lazy talking heads on more neutral outlets this bit of news, but your talking points and headlines are all wrong. This special election had nothing to do with the Affordable Care Act and does nothing to predict the results in this coming November's elections.

Like the before-mentioned poll numbers showcased, I think if the Republican Party obsesses over the healthcare law like they've been doing since it was signed in 2010, it'll only hurt them come November. Do they really think the number one concern of a vast majority of people in this country is Obamacare? What about job creation? Raising wages? Income inequality? Education? Infrastructure? Improving the economy? Reducing crime? While Democratic candidates will likely run with a number of these issues, especially with regard to income inequality (overall, and between men and women) and raising the minimum wage, which most people tend to agree with, Republican candidates seem destined to run on the mantra of, "We want to take away millions of people's healthcare!" Let me condense that some:

Democrats: "We think everyone deserves to make a living wage, and women should be treated as equals at the workplace! More people need to make more money and we're going to see to it that that happens!"

Republicans: "We think millions of people should have their healthcare taken from them!"


While it's true that a solid majority of this country despises both political parties right now, I'll take that before-mentioned Democratic selling point over the Republican one any day of the week.

http://thinkprogress.org/election/2014/03/12/3396421/florida-special-election-obamacare/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"