Skip to main content

Kudos to Geno Auriemma

For those of you unfamiliar with women's college basketball, the name Geno Auriemma may not ring a bell. Sports fan or not, however, what I'm about to share about the man will undoubtedly win over some new admirers.

First off, Geno Auriemma has coached the UConn (Connecticut) women's basketball team for 32 years. His resumé has reached the point where it's not even debatable anymore to say this man is one of the greatest coaches in sports history. In the past 24 years, Auriemma's Huskies have won 11 national titles, gone to the Final Four 6 additional times, the Elite Eight 5 others, and a pair of Sweet Sixteens. So, in the past 2.5 decades, Auriemma's squad has fared no worse than the top 16 in the country, has been one of the four best teams near 75% of the time, and has come close to winning 50% of the national championships. So to say Geno Auriemma has been dominant as a head coach in women's college basketball and deserves praise for his long list of accomplishments would be quite the understatement. In my mind, however, what he recently said with regard to the budget battle in the state of Connecticut was even more impressive.

Auriemma, slated to make over $2 million next year, has offered to coach for free next season. As he put it:

"I'll tell you what. I'll work for free next year. I'll give up what the state pays me, what the taxpayers are paying me, but guess what? I pay my taxes and I don't care how much money it costs for me to have good schools where I live in Manchester. My [adult] kids don't go to school there. I can afford it. I want to be proud of our town's education system. Why is it that older people turn their back on education when somebody paid for their kids when they were in school? We've lost sight of what we have to do for other people."

He added:

"I do not want to come across as someone who doesn't understand what the realities are. Not unlike a lot of states, Connecticut is facing real issues of how to pay its obligations. Some people are going to get hurt. I don't know if anyone is going to get helped. This is like a family issue. Everybody is going to have to suffer a little bit.

You try to be fair to everyone, real about what your priorities are and don't let politics get in the way. Whether it's the politics of UConn lobbying for its benefit or one party or another -- one's in favor, one's against -- and then it's less about the issue and more about who's going to be right and who's going to be wrong."

Whether Auriemma's offer gets taken seriously or not, his powerful words and selfless gesture deserve just as much, if not more praise than his on-the-court feats. He's right - many people in this country lose sight of what helped them reach their current point in life, as they delusionally recite the inaccurate yet catch bumper sticker slogan of "I built that!" while completely denying all those whom helped them garner the knowledge to "build that," if not literally aided them in "building that." So, I tip my hat to Geno Auriemma. Major kudos to you, and I hope your insightful words and kind offer inspire others to think and act similarly!

http://www.espn.com/womens-college-basketball/story/_/id/20784596/geno-auriemma-offers-forgo-pay-university-connecticut-coach-education-budget-battle

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"