Skip to main content

The Paradoxical BMI

While I've long been a critic of the BMI (Body Mass Index), I was still shocked to see my latest such score when stepping on the scale at a recent doctor's appointment. At 5'9'', I weighed 200 lbs., which translates to a BMI score of 30, and registers as borderline obese according to the BMI chart.

When looking at the increasingly popular waist-to-height ratio, as I have a 32'' waist, I registered at a 46.38, which is categorized as "healthy." Not only that, but my score was closer to "healthy slim" (42%) than "overweight" (53%). For one to be considered "obese," their ratio has to be at least 63%.

Lastly, I checked out a body fat calculator. My numbers resulted in a score of 10.99%, which is categorized as "athletes," less than half the percentage of what is considered to be "obese" (25%+).

So, let me get this straight. According to the traditional BMI chart, I'm borderline obese. According to the waist-to-height ratio chart, I'm healthy. Lastly, according to the body fat calculator, I'm an athlete. These contradictions just go on to further highlight the problems with the traditional BMI formula. It doesn't take into account gender differences, muscle vs. fat, etc. It provides a one-size-fits-all mentality, which is often highly problematic when dealing with people's health. Sure, perhaps it's better to be safe than sorry, but it's also ridiculous to view a sumo wrestler and Michael Jordan in his prime as equals in terms of health just because their BMI scores are relatively similar. When I hear a doctor talk about an obese healthy athlete in a serious tone, I may change my tune, but I have a hunch I'll be waiting a while for that to occur.

https://www.vertex42.com/ExcelTemplates/Images/body-mass-index-chart.gif

http://www.bmi-calculator.net/waist-to-height-ratio-calculator/#result

http://www.bmi-calculator.net/body-fat-calculator/#result

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i